Go Back   Cockos Incorporated Forums > REAPER Forums > REAPER Q&A, Tips, Tricks and Howto

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-23-2015, 09:48 AM   #1
whiteaxxxe
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: United States of Europe, Germany, Mönchengladbach
Posts: 2,047
Default pan law: the same if in channel or in master?

so I stumbled just over the possibility to set the pan law in the master. (Bitwig theme, I assume its with every theme the same).

am I right to assume, if I set the pan law in the master to -3db that that would be the same as if I set it in all channels to -3db?

if I set it in the master and not generally in the channels, I dont run into the hassle of remembering to set it back to 0db for folders, fx returns, groups and so on.

so, if I want it to be -3db I set everything to 0db pan law, in the master to -3db pan law and forget about that for all times???
whiteaxxxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 10:39 AM   #2
Fergler
Human being with feelings
 
Fergler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 5,220
Default

Afaik, no, the pan law of the master only affects the panning of the master track. I think the confusion comes from most other DAWs using a global pan law rather than a per-track pan law.

If you want -3 for everything set that as the project default before starting a project and probably just ignore the master. Personally I've never had a reason to pan the master track. In fact, the first thing I did when I learned about WALTER was remove the pan, mute, and solo from the TCP master track. When I'm routing to hardware I use pre-master busses anyway so they serve no purpose to me.
Fergler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 10:44 AM   #3
whiteaxxxe
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: United States of Europe, Germany, Mönchengladbach
Posts: 2,047
Default

yes, sure it affects only the master. so it affects everything going out of Reaper? that is what I want. it pushes down the center of the mix about -3db. if I do it on all channels but not on the master it should be the same result?

maybe I should do some null-tests ...
whiteaxxxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 11:22 AM   #4
whiteaxxxe
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: United States of Europe, Germany, Mönchengladbach
Posts: 2,047
Default

yep, I did.

so I imported a track into Reaper. rendered it out with track set to -3db pan law.

same track rendered out with master set to pan law -3db.

reimported the two renders back into Reaper, flipped the phase of one, and: null.

so I dont need to set the pan law per channel, I can do it in the master.

or have I missed something?
whiteaxxxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 12:34 PM   #5
ashcat_lt
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,296
Default

Try it again with a mono source and modulate the track pan from center to left and then over to the right. Render it twice like you did before.
ashcat_lt is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 01:14 PM   #6
whiteaxxxe
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: United States of Europe, Germany, Mönchengladbach
Posts: 2,047
Default

wtf???

very interesting ... it nulls with modulated pan across the whole stereo width only when the mono-source is exactly in the center.

and now someone can give me some elusive explanation for this? enlighten me, please ... and I thought I would have a extreme simple solution for something that bugs me on and on and on ... f*'&$&§ pan law ... I never really understood and when I thought I had a grasp on it: nothing.

the thing is: I am working on a template for 2 drummers (with Groove Agent 2, faking something like Allman Brothers or Grateful Dead, its for a maybe-revival of a band from the last centennials mid 70s). works really well, panning is crucial. so there are no things flying around from left to right and vice versa, so I think to have the same results (as shown in the first null-test) regardless I have the pan law on the channels or on the master. pan law on the master means I have not to fight with "remember to switch off pan law if you use a folder".

so normally I would use no pan law at all, as I always did and do. but in that case the 2 drummers seem to be more spacious sounding and more distinct from one another - the drumsets are not equal, of course, the sounds are slightly different for each drummer - if I use a pan law. can be expectation bias, on the other hand the null-test with stereowise static material worked.

now what would I do now ... f*$& the second null-test? I tend to do that ... any other recommendations?
whiteaxxxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 03:14 PM   #7
ashcat_lt
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,296
Default

How the pan law affects any given track is completely dependent on the position of that track's pan pot. If you set the Master to -3 and then leave its pan pot in the middle, you're doing nothing but attenuating everything that comes into the Master by 3db. This will have the same effect as setting a bus or folder at -3db and leaving its pan pot at center. It will not ever accomplish what you're hoping for because it's basically the pan pot that makes it work.

If you don't want to use the thing on each track/folder, then you just adjust the volume manually along with the pan.,
ashcat_lt is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 03:24 PM   #8
whiteaxxxe
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: United States of Europe, Germany, Mönchengladbach
Posts: 2,047
Default

that is what I will do ... theres no other way.

thanx for the replies!
whiteaxxxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 04:12 PM   #9
Banned
Human being with feelings
 
Banned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Unwired (probably in the proximity of Amsterdam)
Posts: 4,868
Default

[OT]

Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteaxxxe View Post
I am working on a template for 2 drummers (with Groove Agent 2, faking something like Allman Brothers or Grateful Dead, its for a maybe-revival of a band from the last centennials mid 70s).
Or, be funky like James Brown, and prepare a setup for five drummers.

Oh well.. I'd sure settle for having 'only' Stubblefield and Jabo.
__________________
˙lɐd 'ʎɐʍ ƃuoɹʍ ǝɥʇ ǝɔıʌǝp ʇɐɥʇ ƃuıploɥ ǝɹ,noʎ
Banned is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.