|
|
|
04-06-2010, 05:58 PM
|
#1
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 179
|
Upward Compression?
Any tips on acheiving upward compression in REAPER?
From Wikipedia: "Upward compression involves making sounds below the threshold louder while the louder passages remain unchanged."
I understand you can get something similar with parallel compression, but it's not quite the same, since mixing in the compressed signal also boosts the transients.
Basically, I'm looking for a way to leave the transients alone, and boost the rest of the signal.
Thanks,
-Bill
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 06:04 PM
|
#2
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Berlin
Posts: 11,818
|
Parallel is actually the same thing, if you squash the signal in a pleasing fashion and mix that to the original signal. That's about it.
Works well with ReaComp if set up well. The Rocket from Stillwellaudio is predestined for this . They both have wet/dry sliders or knobs.
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 06:10 PM
|
#3
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,203
|
Done properly, parallel compression does not boost transients. The compressed audio has a very low threshold, thereby essentially squashing the transients. What dominates the compressed audio is the lower levels. When summed with the non-compressed audio you end up boosting the lower levels while maintaining the existing transients.
Regards,
DB
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 06:34 PM
|
#4
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 179
|
Technically, if you're adding the squashed signal back in, it will also be added to the transients, right? But, maybe it doesn't matter, since it is only a small amount relative to the energy in the original transient? (But, it is a lot relative to the quiet parts.)
-Bill
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 08:01 PM
|
#5
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,931
|
Neodyminium will do that from elemental audio
An expander will do exactly what you want.
Reverse ratios will do it, waves compressor
Flux compressor bundle and solara will do it.
Any js expander or vst expander will do this
A compander will do both for you
De compression will do it (I use it on badly comped vox at tracking)
And lastly parallel comprrssion I've NEVER used for expansion (upward compression / reverse ratio)
Because it doesn't do anything to the original audio, its hard to explain what I'm saying here. NY compression adds too much body for some of todays modern sound. I mean my genres, not rock / etc . . .
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 11:41 PM
|
#6
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,203
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by larrygates
NY compression adds too much body for some of todays modern sound. I mean my genres, not rock / etc . . .
|
Great for fattening up a drum bus. And when used subtly can add touch of body by gently bringing the lower level sounds up. But like larry says, not to be used on everything. Just tool of the craft for those things that need it.
For what the OP wants (bringing the lower level sounds up while leaving the transients intact), when used correctly, would work very well.
Regards,
DB
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 12:37 AM
|
#7
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by larrygates
Neodyminium will do that from elemental audio
An expander will do exactly what you want.
Reverse ratios will do it, waves compressor
Flux compressor bundle and solara will do it.
Any js expander or vst expander will do this
A compander will do both for you
De compression will do it (I use it on badly comped vox at tracking)
And lastly parallel comprrssion I've NEVER used for expansion (upward compression / reverse ratio)
|
I dont quite follow you. Upward compression and Expanding are actually quite the opposite. A Dolby system uses first expansion (attenuates under a given threshold) before recording, then on playback it uses upward compression (It amplifies under a given threshold).
Yves
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 12:44 AM
|
#8
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mcr:uk
Posts: 3,891
|
ReaXcomp let's you have ratios like 0.5:1. Is that the same thing?
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 12:52 AM
|
#9
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,809
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IXix
ReaXcomp let's you have ratios like 0.5:1. Is that the same thing?
|
No,-
From what I understand the op wants a compressor that works to expand above a certain threshold,- but then ignore everything else above another higher threshold.
There is a freebie compressor which will do that,- buggered if i can remember the name of it though sorry....
Kind regards
Dave Rich
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 04:28 AM
|
#11
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saarlänner
Posts: 1,141
|
Just for clarification:
Does anyone know of a dynamics processor with freely configurable characteristic, so that all of the above is achievable?
Last edited by Blechi; 04-07-2010 at 04:36 AM.
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 04:31 AM
|
#12
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 179
|
Thanks all. My understanding is that upward compression (boost quiet stuff) definitely is not the same thing as expansion (attenuate quiet stuff). However, it seems there could be a subtle difference between parallel compression and upward compression in whether or not the transients are also boosted at all. I look forward to checking out Mich's JS plugs later. (Thanks!)
-Bill
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 04:39 AM
|
#13
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 642
|
It's getting harder to find these days, but Slim Slow Slider's expander VST (a freebie) does upward expansion.
But on my main DAW (Tracktion) it started to become strange under Vista. Projects have to be cancelled out of (clobbered with Task Manager) when I use that plug in Tracktion with Vista.
But Tracktion is known to have some problems with its "fx engine" (don't know if "fx engine" is a correct term as I don't know the Traction code base).
So it might work in Reaper. It has a side chain, so you'll have to know how to set up Reaper Channels. (I'm afraid nothing I've ever seen or used beats Tracktion for ease of signal routing, including Reaper. Hate to sound like a Fan Boy, but Tracktion's signal routing is a better design than anything else I've seen.)
http://www.kvraudio.com/get/1616.html
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 05:05 AM
|
#14
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tuscany (Italy)
Posts: 144
|
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 05:21 AM
|
#15
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 729
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fieldswn
Any tips on acheiving upward compression in REAPER?
From Wikipedia: "Upward compression involves making sounds below the threshold louder while the louder passages remain unchanged."
I understand you can get something similar with parallel compression, but it's not quite the same, since mixing in the compressed signal also boosts the transients.
Basically, I'm looking for a way to leave the transients alone, and boost the rest of the signal.
Thanks,
-Bill
|
Thats typically known as expansion. There are a few plugs out there that can do it. digitalfishphones has one I believe
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 05:31 AM
|
#16
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saarlänner
Posts: 1,141
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePriest
|
Ahh, yes, that'll do.
Thanks for the link.
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 05:59 AM
|
#17
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: home is where the heart is
Posts: 12,110
|
Adding on Blechi's pics (and how I things understand):
Upward compression is not expansion.
Compression => reducing dynamic range
Expansion => increase of dynamic range
- downward compression:
traditional comp, making loud passages more quiet
- upward compression:
making soft passages louder
can be achieved with parallel compression
- upward expansion:
making loud passages louder (can be used to "un-compress" overly squashed material)
- downward expansion:
making soft passages more quiet (the mechanism noise gates are using)
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 06:11 AM
|
#18
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,931
|
I dunno, I've never used the word "upward compression" before.
When I looked at it, what he wants is so similar to expansion I can't think of anything else. I didn't say just expansion, there are comps that have inverted ratios, which I'm thinking this guy wants too.
To me it kind of seems like the difference between a limiter and compressor. For the most part they achieve the same goal, and go about it almost the same way, just different "end result?"
I would think the practical application of "upward compression" would be to "de-compress" something. Which can be done with the plugs I mentioned above. Don't know of any free ones though that can.
Plus it doesn't seem that far off to me in sound. I'll have to mess around with something you guys would call an "upward compressor" and go from there. I know for sure I used a flux demo "de comp" to do EXACTLY what the OP was talking about. It was on a few vox phrases that were done with an Avalon 737 where the compressor acted too slowly and squased the vox badly. Used "upward compression" to make it sound more normal. NO?
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 07:12 AM
|
#19
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nofish
Upward compression is not expansion.
Compression => reducing dynamic range
Expansion => increase of dynamic range
- downward compression:
traditional comp, making loud passages more quiet
- upward compression:
making soft passages louder
can be achieved with parallel compression
- upward expansion:
making loud passages louder (can be used to "un-compress" overly squashed material)
- downward expansion:
making soft passages more quiet (the mechanism noise gates are using)
|
nofish has captured it perfectly. However, I still wonder if there is a difference between upward compression and parallel compression. In parallel compression the transients are also boosted (if only a little, relatively speaking). In real upward compression, the transients should be left alone.
-Bill
|
|
|
04-08-2010, 11:39 AM
|
#20
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saarlänner
Posts: 1,141
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePriest
|
Downloaded - tried - bought
Man, this thing is really great.
All four characteristics, wet/dry control for easy parallel use and a 'hold' parameter.
All that for 10EUR, perfect.
|
|
|
04-08-2010, 12:38 PM
|
#21
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 7,942
|
me too...
I had a look and bought one too, Blechi.
>
|
|
|
04-08-2010, 08:38 PM
|
#22
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 94
|
Michael, thank you for the mod to make the up-comp. Is there a way to set a gain limit? It can easily hit +60db when the track has nothing happening or have I screwed up something?
|
|
|
04-08-2010, 09:23 PM
|
#23
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 299
|
This might help
|
|
|
04-08-2010, 11:03 PM
|
#24
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tx
Posts: 707
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pitpat
|
That one's a little weird though. It's actually a linear compressor, I believe. It gives you neat control, but something that converts the compression to dB may be better.
|
|
|
09-07-2011, 08:51 AM
|
#25
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mich
|
Can anyone who downloaded this while it was available re-post it somewhere such as SendSpace? Thanks.
|
|
|
10-13-2011, 04:04 PM
|
#26
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 776
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeachyB
Can anyone who downloaded this while it was available re-post it somewhere such as SendSpace? Thanks.
|
Yes please. Can't find a simple JS upward compressor
|
|
|
10-14-2011, 10:19 AM
|
#27
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Shaolin => NJ
Posts: 1,213
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeachyB
Can anyone who downloaded this while it was available re-post it somewhere such as SendSpace? Thanks.
|
Me three!!!
|
|
|
10-14-2011, 12:29 PM
|
#28
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,082
|
In the end, what is the difference between making the quiet stuff louder or making the louder stuff quieter?
You still end up with the same dynamic range.
|
|
|
10-14-2011, 02:11 PM
|
#29
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South, UK
Posts: 14,218
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAPT
In the end, what is the difference between making the quiet stuff louder or making the louder stuff quieter?
You still end up with the same dynamic range.
|
transients/attack (above the thresold) are not effected/modified by an upwards compressor or parallel compression (even less on a properly setup parallel than upwards comp.)
|
|
|
10-16-2011, 12:04 AM
|
#30
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 7,942
|
I've always thought of parallel compression as more of an effect than processing. Normal compression can be used to dynamically process a signal and/or apply the character of a specific comp to a sound. With parallel, you hit a character comp relatively hard and then blend that in with your unprocessed (dry) sound, just as you would with a reverb.
You wouldn't use prallel compression with a non-character comp, would you?
...But there are no rules, only results.
>
c
|
|
|
10-16-2011, 05:54 AM
|
#31
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePriest
|
I can't find this on his site!
|
|
|
08-06-2020, 01:09 AM
|
#32
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,826
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mich
|
Necro boot, anybody still got this JS ?
I'm looking for an upward compressor.
__________________
Stop posting huge images, smaller images or thumbnail, it's not rocket science!
|
|
|
08-06-2020, 01:16 AM
|
#33
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 1,444
|
|
|
|
08-06-2020, 01:26 AM
|
#34
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Berlin
Posts: 2,202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Win Conway
Necro boot, anybody still got this JS ?
I'm looking for an upward compressor.
|
You could use General Dynamics. It's one of my favorite plugins
|
|
|
08-06-2020, 02:35 AM
|
#35
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,826
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FeedTheCat
You could use General Dynamics. It's one of my favorite plugins
|
Awesome, forgot about that one.
Still want the loser mod if anybody has it
__________________
Stop posting huge images, smaller images or thumbnail, it's not rocket science!
|
|
|
08-06-2020, 04:23 AM
|
#36
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 42
|
Waves MV2 does it very well, I love it on vocals. It just doesn’t have attack/decay settings, it's a simple GUI.
|
|
|
08-06-2020, 04:47 AM
|
#37
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Ukraine, Kyiv
Posts: 546
|
Great option would be the Dynamics by Kilohearts - https://youtu.be/hsr6XAwyBas
|
|
|
08-06-2020, 09:01 AM
|
#38
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,295
|
I wish somebody could point me to a hardware unit that supposedly does upward compression so I could maybe look at a schematic. ATM I don’t think it’s an actual thing, but rather a misunderstanding about how certain compressors actually work.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:39 AM.
|