[Notation editor] - the writing of the rhythms is almost good!!

[tohubohu]

Reaper 6.70
mac os 10.15.7

Hello,

here are the two best cases for writing rhythms

There is no way to fix this so that it is always perfect? not much is missing.


1 -

With this rhythm pattern, starting from the second eighth note, the rhythms are all perfect until the last sixteenth note.
a dotted half note should be written instead of the half note tied to the quarter note







2 -


With this rhythm pattern, starting from the fourth eighth note, the rhythms are all perfect.

[tohubohu]

Bump!

[TonE]

Is not example 2 same as 1, in 2 you only had no space for pulling the note longer, it would behave same as above probably, if you could, or not?

[tohubohu]

Hello, thank you for your interest.
if I go further, you see that we don't have exactly the same behavior as 1. If I put myself in 6/4 I haven't checked...
In reality, we have found that there is hidden functionality in changing rhythm pattern that change beats and beams.
I would have liked to know if Schwa could do something or if it was definitely not possible. In this case, it might be necessary to highlight in the software that we can change the rhythms and beams by changing the rhythm pattern, or find a workaround to allow us to change the rhythms more easily in order to find the best one.
For example, we could have several proposed rhythms without this affecting the beat of the metronome ??!!

[TonE]

Looks like a bug then.

[tohubohu]

Originally Posted by TonE

Looks like a bug then.

It's more of a design flaw I think. And we need to find a workaround.

[TonE]

Yes, bug in the sense not tested far enough it seems up to longer notes. Sequence of note transformations needs to be updated somehow. Should be easy to be corrected. Let us hope Schwa will see this thread soon.

[tohubohu]

hmmm... I don't know anything about programming but I don't know why, my intuition tells me that it's probably very very complicated to fix.
And that a workaround would seem more feasible to me but maybe I'm wrong.

[michael diemer]

Bump.