Go Back   Cockos Incorporated Forums > REAPER Forums > REAPER Pre-Release Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-27-2023, 03:11 AM   #41
mozart999uk
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,721
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mccrabney View Post
i can't thank you folks enough for chasing down these AI issues/details. i've never enjoyed working in REAPER so much as i have in the last few weeks. this is a massive improvement and i hope it doesn't go unnoticed by the larger community.
Same here. Thanks Devs and Thanks mccrabney for testing :-)
mozart999uk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2023, 03:40 AM   #42
Thonex
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Klangfarben View Post
Also, you only have a total of 10 screensets. So, you would be using up most of your available track view screensets just for simple zoom commands. And if you have screensets already assigned you are going to have to dump some of them, again just to zoom. That's not very efficient and not really a workaround option imho.
I agree... I've tried screensets multiple times in the past and abandoned them because they never really worked for me.

I think zoom presets would be fantastic. You can zoom into anything you want in Reaper, but it can be tedious. I would love to see some Vertical (TCP) zoom presets and some Horizontal (amount of time displayed in the arrange area) presets that would be action-able.

For example, the default track height (user definable in the Reaper prefs, not theme) could be "one" track height unit. And you could have 2 x unit, 3 x unit, 4 x unit... etc. heights for tracks. And you could also choose to have (say) a Horizontal zoom of 250ms for the entire arrange window if you are doing delicate transient work on a sound. Or, 5 min zoom for a whole piece. etc.

I hope I'm making sense.

Anyway... I fully support some kind of predictable zoom preset system. No need to change the zoom functionality, just an easier way to recall presets.
__________________
Cheers... Andrew K
Reaper v6.80+dev0621 - June 21 2023 • Catalina • Mac Mini 2020 6 core i7 • 64GB RAM • OS: Catalina • 4K monitor • RME RayDAT card with Sync Card and extended Light Pipe.
Thonex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2023, 04:01 AM   #43
_Stevie_
Human being with feelings
 
_Stevie_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Black Forest
Posts: 5,054
Default

That's a superb write up, Thonex.

And it reminded me, that we don't have a native "enlarge selected track" feature.
Well, we somewhat do, but it's tied to rec arm and the size is not user definable:



There are a couple of scripts out there, but let me show you a comparison.

Scripted enlarge selected track:





Native enlarge selected track:





It would be awesome, if the already existing feature could be extended to:

- enlarge selected track, no matter if it's rec armed or not
- the ability to define a custom track height

Thanks for considering!
__________________
My Reascripts forum thread | My Reascripts on GitHub
If you like or use my scripts, please support the Ukraine: Ukraine Crisis Relief Fund | DirectRelief | Save The Children | Razom
_Stevie_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2023, 07:01 AM   #44
Futur8me
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 394
Default

Hello, I’ve noticed that the horizontal mouse wheel movement works in opposite directions when in the mixer view compared to the arrangement view.

I’m using a mx master 3 mouse.., when I use the horizontal thumb wheel up to go right in the mixer window it goes right.. but in the arrangement view window it goes left..?, it should work in the same direction for both arrangement view and the mixer view shouldn’t it?.

It works in the exact same direction in both bitwig and Logic Pro X.., is it a bug in Reaper?.

.
.
__________________
16" M1Pro MacBook Pro, 32gig ram, 1TB ssd, macOS 14
Futur8me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2023, 07:42 AM   #45
bFooz
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 2,588
Default

There are assignable actions in the action list, search "scroll horiz mousewheel". There are reversed and non-reversed versions.

Don't know how it works with the horizontal mousewheel though.
bFooz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2023, 07:49 AM   #46
BPBaker
Human being with feelings
 
BPBaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin View Post
You can set the maximum in pref/editing behavior to be more than 100%
True. But on tracks with large numbers of takes or many FIP items (and of course the upcoming track items not included in this particular RC), the 800% vertical track zoom often still isn't enough for detailed editing in my experience.

And currently, even if your maximum vertical zoom is set to 800%, the "Toggle Zoom to Selected Items" action still sets you to a maximum vertical zoom of 100%, limited by the size of the track. (And then you have to zoom in further from there.)

To me, the most intuitive behavior would be for "Toggle Zoom to Selected Items" to zoom in as far as needed to have an individual item fit to the screen, regardless of track size or the maximum vertical "track" zoom.
BPBaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2023, 08:15 AM   #47
MonkeyBars
Human being with feelings
 
MonkeyBars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Hollyweird
Posts: 2,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Klangfarben View Post
Also, you only have a total of 10 screensets. So, you would be using up most of your available track view screensets just for simple zoom commands. And if you have screensets already assigned you are going to have to dump some of them, again just to zoom. That's not very efficient and not really a workaround option imho.
This touches on my FR for project-based screensets.

Global screensets are okay for studios churning out the same thing over and over between projects, but for creative musicians there tend not to be so few options. Other DAWs I've used tie the screensets to the project, which makes a lot more sense to me as my projects tend to vary widely from one to the next.
MonkeyBars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2023, 08:59 AM   #48
Klangfarben
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Stevie_ View Post
It would be awesome, if the already existing feature could be extended to:

- enlarge selected track, no matter if it's rec armed or not
- the ability to define a custom track height
Now THAT is high quality GIF reporting! And perfectly shows why scripts/screensets can't cover this.
Klangfarben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2023, 02:08 PM   #49
bFooz
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 2,588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin View Post
make a custom action that has one or more "Action: Modify MIDI CC/mousewheel: 2x" followed by the zoom action... see how many of those "2x" you need to make it as it was.
I need 3x "0.5" to feel alright.

Just to be totally clear: (MIDI editor context and scrolling in notation).
bFooz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2023, 04:21 PM   #50
FeedTheCat
Human being with feelings
 
FeedTheCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Berlin
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Odys View Post
+ ReaScript: add SendMIDIMessageToHardware()
I'm curious about the new API function.

Is there a benefit to using this over consecutive StuffMIDIMessage functions for Sysex? Is it faster for sending large chunks?
__________________
Featured scripts: REAPER Update UtilityLil ChordboxGridbox/Adaptive gridMX TunerRS5K LinkMIDI Editor Magic Donate💝: PayPal|ko-fi
FeedTheCat is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2023, 06:30 PM   #51
JamesX
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpl View Post
Thanks for this, Justin, from first testing that seems to work (at least launchpad enters session mode from REAPER)!
MPL,

Was your use of SendMIDIMessageToHardware() for a sysex message?

If so, could you give some details as to how you did this?

Thanks,

J
JamesX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2023, 09:09 PM   #52
Justin
Administrator
 
Justin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,721
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FeedTheCat View Post
I'm curious about the new API function.

Is there a benefit to using this over consecutive StuffMIDIMessage functions for Sysex? Is it faster for sending large chunks?
StuffMIDIMessage can’t be reliably used for sysex
Justin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2023, 04:26 AM   #53
FeedTheCat
Human being with feelings
 
FeedTheCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Berlin
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin View Post
StuffMIDIMessage can’t be reliably used for sysex
Thx, makes sense. I'll start using the new function for some controller stuff I've got going on.
__________________
Featured scripts: REAPER Update UtilityLil ChordboxGridbox/Adaptive gridMX TunerRS5K LinkMIDI Editor Magic Donate💝: PayPal|ko-fi
FeedTheCat is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2023, 12:47 AM   #54
_Stevie_
Human being with feelings
 
_Stevie_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Black Forest
Posts: 5,054
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BPBaker View Post

To me, the most intuitive behavior would be for "Toggle Zoom to Selected Items" to zoom in as far as needed to have an individual item fit to the screen, regardless of track size or the maximum vertical "track" zoom.
Yep, aka „enlarge selected track / item“, which would benefit the comp system AND the arrange. That’s why I mentioned it in my post.
__________________
My Reascripts forum thread | My Reascripts on GitHub
If you like or use my scripts, please support the Ukraine: Ukraine Crisis Relief Fund | DirectRelief | Save The Children | Razom
_Stevie_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2023, 11:42 AM   #55
Justin
Administrator
 
Justin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,721
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bFooz View Post
I need 3x "0.5" to feel alright.

Just to be totally clear: (MIDI editor context and scrolling in notation).
Thanks! Does it feel right in the piano roll view with that or does it become way too slow?

also is the difference zoom-dependent or the same at all zoom levels?

Part of the reason is that in the score, it treated large mousewheel movements as small ones previously, so now it will be faster with the larger movements but possibly the same speed when moving it more slowly. So a 1:1 translation might not be expected.

Last edited by Justin; 03-01-2023 at 11:52 AM.
Justin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2023, 01:24 PM   #56
Phazma
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin View Post
Thanks! Does it feel right in the piano roll view with that or does it become way too slow?

also is the difference zoom-dependent or the same at all zoom levels?

Part of the reason is that in the score, it treated large mousewheel movements as small ones previously, so now it will be faster with the larger movements but possibly the same speed when moving it more slowly. So a 1:1 translation might not be expected.
Not sure if it is useful feedback and related to this, but one thing I noticed on macOS in the piano roll is that vertical scroll doesn't respond correctly to mouse inertia. Both horizontal/vertical scroll in the arrange window and horizontal scroll in the MIDI editor accellerate based on the mousewheel movement but vertical scroll in the MIDI editor seems to have a fixed speed which feels rather fast when zoomed in and awkwardly slow when zoomed out.

Another weird thing in the MIDI editor is vertical zoom which is very flickery because it uses the pitch under mouse cursor as zoom center (which is totally fine) but it additionally scrolls so that when the top of the mouse cursor reaches the top or bottom of a pitch the view jumps to reposition the mouse cursor again at the top or bottom of the pitch respectively. Instead the scroll and cursor positions hould remain static and only the pitches become bigger or smaller.
Phazma is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2023, 01:31 PM   #57
bFooz
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 2,588
Default

Quote:
Does it feel right in the piano roll view with that or does it become way too slow?
For the pianoroll, I'd say 2x "0.5" matches the notation quite accuratelly.

The physical distance travelled is the same at all zoom levels, which is good.

Quote:
Part of the reason is that in the score, it treated large mousewheel movements as small ones previously, so now it will be faster with the larger movements but possibly the same speed when moving it more slowly. So a 1:1 translation might not be expected.
Hmm, I don't know why this would be treated separatelly, but I do get 1:1 distance with slow vs fast in both pianoroll and notation. I'm on Windows with normal windows mouse with clicks on the wheel. If anything, maybe +-1 click difference but that might be just how the finger moves the wheel.
bFooz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2023, 02:35 PM   #58
Justin
Administrator
 
Justin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,721
Default

ah actually I can make them behave identically between piano roll and notation, which obviously makes the most sense. the factor for that is actually closer to 1/3rd the current ratio...
Justin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2023, 03:19 PM   #59
Phazma
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin View Post
ah actually I can make them behave identically between piano roll and notation, which obviously makes the most sense. the factor for that is actually closer to 1/3rd the current ratio...
Would it maybe be possible to make it overall behave/feel like in the arrangement window? Or is that undesirable for some reason or a totally different implementation?
Phazma is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2023, 02:38 AM   #60
bFooz
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 2,588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phazma View Post
Would it maybe be possible to make it overall behave/feel like in the arrangement window? Or is that undesirable for some reason or a totally different implementation?
Yes, I think for consistency, the distance travelled should be the same everywhere for a vanilla action. And user can then use the same CC speed modifiers in every context if required.
bFooz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2023, 01:29 PM   #61
Buy One
Human being with feelings
 
Buy One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,132
Default

We need more screensets, or at least have them unlocked during REAPER session so we can add our own which i tried once only to hit a snug.
__________________
https://github.com/Buy-One/REAPER-scripts (175)
REAPER is a DAW whose user guide file is larger than its installation file

Last edited by Buy One; 03-05-2023 at 07:45 AM.
Buy One is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2023, 01:38 PM   #62
Buy One
Human being with feelings
 
Buy One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Stevie_ View Post
And it reminded me, that we don't have a native "enlarge selected track" feature.
Not as a factory action, but there're

View: Increase/Decrease selected track heights [a little bit]

Admittedly they don't behave like record arm track enlargement which is exclusive to the selected track.
__________________
https://github.com/Buy-One/REAPER-scripts (175)
REAPER is a DAW whose user guide file is larger than its installation file
Buy One is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2023, 04:21 PM   #63
_Stevie_
Human being with feelings
 
_Stevie_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Black Forest
Posts: 5,054
Default

Hm, that's not at all what I was proposing. My GIF makes it pretty clear, though:
you select a track and it zooms to a pre-defined track height. When you go to a different track, that one zooms and then the previous selected track goes back to its previous track height.
__________________
My Reascripts forum thread | My Reascripts on GitHub
If you like or use my scripts, please support the Ukraine: Ukraine Crisis Relief Fund | DirectRelief | Save The Children | Razom
_Stevie_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2023, 07:04 AM   #64
Buy One
Human being with feelings
 
Buy One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Stevie_ View Post
Hm, that's not at all what I was proposing. My GIF makes it pretty clear, though:

The implication was that it could be scripted using these actions. Not ideal but seems usable

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaPack
Code:
Automatically increase height of selected tracks, decrease others'
__________________
https://github.com/Buy-One/REAPER-scripts (175)
REAPER is a DAW whose user guide file is larger than its installation file

Last edited by Buy One; 03-14-2023 at 07:50 AM.
Buy One is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2023, 08:38 AM   #65
_Stevie_
Human being with feelings
 
_Stevie_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Black Forest
Posts: 5,054
Default

You clearly did not read my post, did you?
The first GIF shows a scripted solution.
__________________
My Reascripts forum thread | My Reascripts on GitHub
If you like or use my scripts, please support the Ukraine: Ukraine Crisis Relief Fund | DirectRelief | Save The Children | Razom
_Stevie_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2023, 02:02 PM   #66
Buy One
Human being with feelings
 
Buy One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,132
Default

It didn't work like the native feature.
__________________
https://github.com/Buy-One/REAPER-scripts (175)
REAPER is a DAW whose user guide file is larger than its installation file
Buy One is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2023, 02:22 PM   #67
_Stevie_
Human being with feelings
 
_Stevie_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Black Forest
Posts: 5,054
Default

So what you are trying to say is that the native action "View: Increase/Decrease selected track heights [a little bit]" is faster than setting the track height via the API?

But even if that's the case, the "enlarge selected track" feature would need a lot more than that, like monitoring the height of all tracks in the project. It would need when selecting the track via keyboard OR mouse. All scripts I have tried to date unfortunately don't work reliably in that regard.
__________________
My Reascripts forum thread | My Reascripts on GitHub
If you like or use my scripts, please support the Ukraine: Ukraine Crisis Relief Fund | DirectRelief | Save The Children | Razom
_Stevie_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2023, 03:16 PM   #68
Buy One
Human being with feelings
 
Buy One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,132
Default

To me the most obvious difference between the scripted solution shown in the movie GIF and the native 'show full TCP on armed track' feature is that in the former tracks aren't expanded as soon as they're selected. But that's feasible with a defer loop. I'm not saying native feature is useless but that it can be emulated with the current toolkit.
__________________
https://github.com/Buy-One/REAPER-scripts (175)
REAPER is a DAW whose user guide file is larger than its installation file
Buy One is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2023, 03:25 PM   #69
Klangfarben
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buy One View Post
To me the most obvious difference between the scripted solution shown in the movie GIF and the native 'show full TCP on armed track' feature is that in the former tracks aren't expanded as soon as they're selected. But that's feasible with a defer loop. I'm not saying native feature is useless but that it can be emulated with the current toolkit.
It literally can't be done with a defer loop, you twat. That is literally the ENTIRE point of the request. If it *could* be done, we would have scripted it by now.

Also, I would suggest actually reading some of the posts too. I know it's a lot harder than watching visuals, but it really can be enlightening sometimes.
Klangfarben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2023, 03:34 PM   #70
_Stevie_
Human being with feelings
 
_Stevie_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Black Forest
Posts: 5,054
Default

You mean a defer script like this?

Welcome to Track Zoom Roulette!

__________________
My Reascripts forum thread | My Reascripts on GitHub
If you like or use my scripts, please support the Ukraine: Ukraine Crisis Relief Fund | DirectRelief | Save The Children | Razom
_Stevie_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2023, 03:43 PM   #71
Klangfarben
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,701
Default

OMG Stevie, that is SO much better! I'm going to install that right now. You can clearly see how well the defer loop works for this!
Klangfarben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2023, 04:59 PM   #72
Thonex
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Klangfarben View Post
OMG Stevie, that is SO much better! I'm going to install that right now. You can clearly see how well the defer loop works for this!
To clarify, Klangfarben is being sarcastic here. I’m mentioning this for those who don’t read threads for context. He means the opposite, that Stevie’s request should be native
And not scripted.
__________________
Cheers... Andrew K
Reaper v6.80+dev0621 - June 21 2023 • Catalina • Mac Mini 2020 6 core i7 • 64GB RAM • OS: Catalina • 4K monitor • RME RayDAT card with Sync Card and extended Light Pipe.
Thonex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2023, 05:10 PM   #73
Thonex
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,719
Default

I will add this: when a SCRIPTER like Stevie asks for something to be native, there is a good reason. Just look at all the scripts written by “sr_” in Reapack. I don’t think Stevie just posts these requests without having seriously researched it.
__________________
Cheers... Andrew K
Reaper v6.80+dev0621 - June 21 2023 • Catalina • Mac Mini 2020 6 core i7 • 64GB RAM • OS: Catalina • 4K monitor • RME RayDAT card with Sync Card and extended Light Pipe.
Thonex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2023, 07:18 AM   #74
Buy One
Human being with feelings
 
Buy One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Klangfarben View Post
you twat.
Wow din't expect such a trivial matter to spark such emotion, LOL
Like, really, insulting out of the blue... Are you the 'scripter' whose 'solution' is demonstrated in Stevie's GIF? If you are i could empathize with you.

Now i know that you're someone 'with feelings', whether human being or not, that remains unclear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Klangfarben View Post
It literally can't be done with a defer loop.
Ready to bet you life or eat your hat?

This is CGI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Klangfarben View Post
If it *could* be done, we would have scripted it by now.
WE who? An elite fraternity of scripters Kappa Tau Delta who empowered you to speak on its behalf?
__________________
https://github.com/Buy-One/REAPER-scripts (175)
REAPER is a DAW whose user guide file is larger than its installation file
Buy One is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2023, 07:25 AM   #75
schwa
Administrator
 
schwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 15,747
Default

Cmon no name calling.
schwa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2023, 07:29 AM   #76
Buy One
Human being with feelings
 
Buy One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thonex View Post
Just look at all the scripts written by “sr_” in Reapack. I don’t think Stevie just posts these requests without having seriously researched it.
So i cannot respond to his posts daring to sound disagreeing with the authority, got it. Please excuse me.
__________________
https://github.com/Buy-One/REAPER-scripts (175)
REAPER is a DAW whose user guide file is larger than its installation file
Buy One is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2023, 07:30 AM   #77
Buy One
Human being with feelings
 
Buy One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schwa View Post
Cmon no name calling.
Should i remove this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buy One View Post
Kappa Tau Delta
__________________
https://github.com/Buy-One/REAPER-scripts (175)
REAPER is a DAW whose user guide file is larger than its installation file
Buy One is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2023, 07:33 AM   #78
_Stevie_
Human being with feelings
 
_Stevie_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Black Forest
Posts: 5,054
Default

The point is that someone (me) suggested to implement a native "enlarge selected track" feature, because it would also come handy, when editing takes with the new comp mode (there has been quite some feedback from users where the lanes are flooded with items and you can't see the wood for trees).

But then you come across and completely play it down and say: it can be done with scripting and render the FR useless. That is not nice.

As I said, I have been trying all the scripts out there (and no, the shown script is done by a member of the scripting community and not Klangfarben).
The issue becomes apparent, when you actually have 100s of tracks and all of them loaded with Kontakt instances and whatnot.

We need a robust solution for this feature, that is all I am saying.
__________________
My Reascripts forum thread | My Reascripts on GitHub
If you like or use my scripts, please support the Ukraine: Ukraine Crisis Relief Fund | DirectRelief | Save The Children | Razom
_Stevie_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2023, 07:56 AM   #79
_Stevie_
Human being with feelings
 
_Stevie_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Black Forest
Posts: 5,054
Default

I put the FR in its own thread:
https://forums.cockos.com/showthread...76#post2655676
__________________
My Reascripts forum thread | My Reascripts on GitHub
If you like or use my scripts, please support the Ukraine: Ukraine Crisis Relief Fund | DirectRelief | Save The Children | Razom
_Stevie_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2023, 09:22 AM   #80
Buy One
Human being with feelings
 
Buy One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Stevie_ View Post
But then you come across and completely play it down and say: it can be done with scripting and render the FR useless. That is not nice.
We need a robust solution for this feature, that is all I am saying.
Maybe that sounded or was perceived that way but this wasn't the import. I'm always in favor of new features, there cannot be too many of them.

The response was to address the GIF in which in my opinion the available scripting potential wasn't utilized.

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Stevie_ View Post
As I said, I have been trying all the scripts out there
Something new may always come along.
__________________
https://github.com/Buy-One/REAPER-scripts (175)
REAPER is a DAW whose user guide file is larger than its installation file
Buy One is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.