05-01-2021, 10:29 AM | #1 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Århus V, Denmark
Posts: 537
|
Speeding up WEBM rendering ???
How can I speed up the endering of WEBM ?
- it's only 0.3 of realtime !
__________________
Best regards KSor, Denmark |
05-04-2021, 11:15 AM | #2 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Århus V, Denmark
Posts: 537
|
No one knows ?
__________________
Best regards KSor, Denmark |
05-04-2021, 11:29 AM | #3 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 7,432
|
So it seems... I have never rendered to WEBM myself, so I have really no idea.
There might be something in the ffmpeg settings that can speed up the rendering, but Reaper gives us very limited control over the ffmpeg settings. And it seems that others have had similar issues https://stackoverflow.com/questions/...webm-very-slow
__________________
// MVHMF I never always did the right thing, but all I did wasn't wrong... |
05-04-2021, 11:36 AM | #4 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Århus V, Denmark
Posts: 537
|
OK ... I have to live with that !
I use WEBM because it gives me the smallest files - I have 100's I have to store. THX
__________________
Best regards KSor, Denmark |
05-04-2021, 12:27 PM | #5 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 13,334
|
Hm, maybe try 1xoffline or online rendering?
|
05-04-2021, 12:38 PM | #6 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Århus V, Denmark
Posts: 537
|
Allready tried ... no difference
__________________
Best regards KSor, Denmark |
05-04-2021, 01:23 PM | #7 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 13,334
|
I also have similar speed with FLV or MKV.
|
05-09-2021, 11:38 AM | #8 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 214
|
I had never tried rendering to WEBM until I noticed your post and thought I'd give it a try to see how my speeds compared to yours.
Up to now I have always rendered thusly: Format: Video (ffmpeg/libav encoder) Format: QT/MOV/MP4, Size: 1920x1080, Framerate: 30.00 fps Video codec: MJPEG, 95% Audio codec: 24 bit PCM That usually results in Rendering speed of 0.8 to 1.2x realtime, and a resulting file of about 1.5 - 2 gigabytes for a 3-4 minute music video. So then I tried the following... Format: Video (ffmpeg/libav encoder) Format: WEBM, Size: 1920x1080, Framerate: 30.00 fps Video codec: VP8, 2048 kbps Audio codec: VORBIS, 256 kbps This resulted in a Rendering speed of about 0.3x realtime, and a resulting file size of about 46 MEGABYTES!!!! WOW!!! I had no idea that WEBM compression could be so much more efficient. No wonder it's so much slower to render. I tried playing the two resulting video files side by side and I don't now if I can tell the difference. How is WEBM compression so much better? The two I just ran, one after the other, and the MOV file was some 36 TIMES larger than the WEBM. All this time I've been twiddling my thumbs uploading 2 gig files to the web, when I could be uploading 50 meg files?!?!?! I need to reevaluate just what I'm seeing here. Last edited by fuzzball; 05-10-2021 at 12:28 PM. |
05-09-2021, 12:01 PM | #9 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Århus V, Denmark
Posts: 537
|
I think it's a little confusing to figure out about this compression.
I tried my WBBM-method with some mp4-files I had done some years back and they ended up BIGGER the the mp4-file itself !!!!! So I'm confused - but keeps on with the WEBM anyway !
__________________
Best regards KSor, Denmark |
07-04-2021, 01:16 PM | #10 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Brasil
Posts: 690
|
Maybe it's a late reply but if file size is of concern, it's better to use a post compression tool after your video is generated. I render in Reaper with ffmpeg (quality set to 96%~97%) in a mkv container and then I use a tool called "Handbrake" to reduce the file size. With "high quality" settings (in Handbrake) I usually get an 8:1 compression ratio if not more.
|
04-09-2022, 12:22 PM | #11 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 1
|
The quicker your PC's CPU the quicker your delivering will finish. By and large, for more limited delivering times, a quicker CPU is better. PROJECT: Larger, more perplexing undertakings will likewise have longer render times for webm files that contrasted with more limited and can be convertible through https://mypcfile.com/viewer/webm, less difficult tasks.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|