Improvements to ReaTune

dePUNDIT · 08-30-2019, 02:49 PM

I wish to propose some improvements to ReaTune here and please do support if u agree with me.
1. ReaTune should be enabled for ARA workflow as this would be great to have instead of the twitchy and buggy Melodyne ARA implementation.
2. ReaTune deserves a proper UI that actually looks and feels good.
3. I think its time ReaTune allows for the editing of Vibrato.

enroe · 08-30-2019, 03:10 PM

Yes, I support your points 1, 2 and 3.
A little more detailed you can read it here
and also here.

mschnell · 08-31-2019, 03:20 AM

Making ReaTune a Melodyne clone would use up a lot of work for the (very few and very busy) Reaper developers. IMHO it's a lot more desirable that they improve Reaper, as Melodyne is available and works rather well for those who really need it.

-Michael

lexaproductions · 08-31-2019, 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dePUNDIT

I wish to propose some improvements to ReaTune here and please do support if u agree with me.
1. ReaTune should be enabled for ARA workflow as this would be great to have instead of the twitchy and buggy Melodyne ARA implementation.
2. ReaTune deserves a proper UI that actually looks and feels good.
3. I think its time ReaTune allows for the editing of Vibrato.

In case you didn’t know, while using Reatune as a take effect, hitting update in its gui, will analyze the whole item just like ARA. No need for playing the whole thing and waiting for the analysis.

mschnell · 08-31-2019, 06:09 AM

Reaper provides a propriety API similar to ARA. This is what ReaTune uses. I don't suppose that there are more plugins that use same.
-Michael

pepe44 · 11-07-2019, 01:30 PM

I was about to make a FR for reatune when came across this in a quick search.
I dont mind the UI, apart from the manual correction things could get a bit more user friendly but! a Zero latency option for live mode should be given. Maybe more people would stop buying waves or antares and start using the stock reatune for this purpose.

Jae.Thomas · 11-07-2019, 01:44 PM

we need reatune's tuner on the TCP

karbomusic · 11-07-2019, 01:47 PM

^For general instrument tuning et al, I keep it in Monitoring FX then I'm only a solo button away from tuning any source on any track at anytime since it's a global setting.

Jae.Thomas · 11-07-2019, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karbomusic

^For general instrument tuning et al, I keep it in Monitoring FX then I'm only a solo button away from tuning any source on any track at anytime since it's a global setting.

thats not a bad idea. I thought of that but also that would be after any fx which might be on the guitar tho

karbomusic · 11-07-2019, 01:58 PM

Yea, you might have to reach over and click the on/off button on the track FX if it is something that actually interferes with the tuner.

I actually go one further, I have an extra physical tuner mounted in my studio (that I can see from anywhere in that room) which I plug output 8 from my RME into - then my sound card mixer/routing sends any input to output #8, in addition to where it was already going - this means any input signal I can hear through my monitor feeds that physical tuner - that's really been the most handy because it solve all those problems.

Jae.Thomas · 11-07-2019, 02:40 PM

I have found a need for it just being right there, docked, at all times. Would be cool to just have it there for any input track currently armed.

MusoBob · 11-07-2019, 05:56 PM

+1
also:
If you could get Reatune's automatic pitch correction notes to follow a send from a MIDI chord track that would help, this is how lots of Virtual Instruments work.

And some parameter access for reaper.TrackFX_Get/SetParam

bwsd · 02-23-2020, 12:35 PM

I subscribe to each point of the request.