|
View Poll Results: Would you use this?
|
|
I would use it
|
   
|
39 |
100.00% |
|
I would not use it
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
I don't care
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
02-22-2016, 06:31 AM
|
#1
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Split, Croatia
Posts: 13
|
ReaEQ adjust dB per oct on HPF and LPF
How about making it posslible to control the steapness (dB per octave) in ReaEQ's filters? Idea: To avoid adding more controls to bands, maybe the gain control can be used for this, since it does nothing in HPF and LPF now.
|
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 09:55 AM
|
#2
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,900
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetalGod
How about making it posslible to control the steapness (dB per octave) in ReaEQ's filters? Idea: To avoid adding more controls to bands, maybe the gain control can be used for this, since it does nothing in HPF and LPF now.
|
Stacking filters at the same exact frequency steepens slopes.
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 11:19 AM
|
#3
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 5,220
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OPI
Stacking filters at the same exact frequency steepens slopes.
|
But that is messy and difficult to edit. You have to adjust four bands for a 24db filter. You can link them now in parameter modulation but that too takes time.
OP's suggestion makes sense, replace gain slider in that instance with Slope.
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 04:52 PM
|
#4
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 6,551
|
Dear lord, +1 to this.
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 04:58 PM
|
#5
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,900
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fergler
But that is messy and difficult to edit. You have to adjust four bands for a 24db filter. You can link them now in parameter modulation but that too takes time.
OP's suggestion makes sense, replace gain slider in that instance with Slope.
|
True. I gave up on reaeq because of that very reason. Automating was taking soooo long. I was just introducing a temporary fix of course.
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 05:35 PM
|
#6
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 13,333
|
It would be great to have such a feature.
|
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 08:29 PM
|
#7
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Split, Croatia
Posts: 13
|
wow, my first post is a hit :P
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 09:13 PM
|
#8
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 5,220
|
But there are probably another 100 threads of this exact issue. 
|
|
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 09:23 AM
|
#9
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Split, Croatia
Posts: 13
|
it's ok with me, it means we're onto something 
|
|
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 09:34 AM
|
#10
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 7,942
|
...at least 6, 12 and 18dB/oct options please +1
>
|
|
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 11:13 AM
|
#11
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Lower Rhine Area, DE
Posts: 964
|
and pleeeeaase give ReaEQ at least 2x oversampling. because of that stupid warping at Nyquist.
|
|
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 12:29 PM
|
#12
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 636
|
All that would be lovely and really usefull and helpfull
+ 78
|
|
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 12:44 PM
|
#13
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 7,942
|
Yes, oversampling plus slope options, please.
Bumpity-bump...
>
|
|
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 02:19 PM
|
#14
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia (originally from Geelong)
Posts: 5,598
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetnine
Yes, oversampling plus slope options, please.
Bumpity-bump...
> |
+33 1/3 from me on both these.
|
|
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 02:32 PM
|
#15
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,900
|
Mhmm. OT: I would like to solo bands also.... Perhaps it's too much of an overhaul
Last edited by OPI; 05-24-2016 at 05:38 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 05:02 PM
|
#16
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,231
|
While we're at it. I would LOVE to be able to double-click to create new bands. Anyone else?
|
|
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 07:00 PM
|
#17
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,257
|
a big +1 for some reaeq love
__________________
Music is the best
เพลง ที่ดีที่สุดคือ
|
|
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 10:07 PM
|
#18
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Chiang Mai, Thailand
Posts: 248
|
Different filter shapes would also be nice. I suggested this a while back to roll apple filter (the plugin) into reaeq. OH, and while they're at it, oversampling too please.
http://forum.cockos.com/showthread.php?t=168381
__________________
Win10 x64, i3930k, 32GB ram
Audio Post | Music Production | Recording Studio | Voice Over
teeramusic.com - Chiang Mai, Thailand
|
|
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 11:45 PM
|
#19
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Near Cambridge UK and Near Questembert, France
Posts: 22,754
|
Good call, but 18dB? Isnt that going to work out a little extreme?
__________________
Ici on parles Franglais
|
|
|
|
|
05-25-2016, 02:38 AM
|
#20
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 7,942
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivansc
Good call, but 18dB? Isnt that going to work out a little extreme?
|
depends what you're doing, I use up to 48dB for sidechaining and band-splitting.
>
|
|
|
|
|
05-25-2016, 12:41 PM
|
#21
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 589
|
+11
Good. Very Good.
__________________
nonononononono
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2016, 04:17 AM
|
#22
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 690
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OPI
Stacking filters at the same exact frequency steepens slopes.
|
I hope this is only meant as a suggestion for a workaround.
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2016, 05:18 AM
|
#23
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Near Cambridge UK and Near Questembert, France
Posts: 22,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetnine
depends what you're doing, I use up to 48dB for sidechaining and band-splitting.
> |
I lead a very sheltered life....
__________________
Ici on parles Franglais
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2016, 07:16 AM
|
#24
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,900
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Masi
I hope this is only meant as a suggestion for a workaround.
|
Yes a work around only. Obviously not ideal..
|
|
|
|
|
05-31-2016, 03:08 AM
|
#25
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia (originally from Geelong)
Posts: 5,598
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivansc
Good call, but 18dB? Isnt that going to work out a little extreme?
|
It depends what you're doing. I often use filter slopes of 24dB or more. Great for removing vocal plosives without pulling out the low end character.
24dB per octave is common when filtering synth sounds too and for foley work on movie tracks.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:18 AM.
|
