|
|
|
03-30-2018, 02:10 PM
|
#1
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South, UK
Posts: 14,218
|
v5.79pre4 - March 30 2018
+ Glue: round start/end times to project samplerate [t=205043]
+ Multiprocessing: allow autodetection of up to 32 cores/threads
+ Performance meter: optionally show xrun counters
# Notation: allow more columns of nearly-overlapping accidentals
# linux: use clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) for various timings, use prio_inherit for event mutexes
# linux: use smaller file reading buffers by default
__________________
subproject FRs click here
note: don't search for my pseudonym on the web. The "musicbynumbers" you find is not me or the name I use for my own music.
|
|
|
03-30-2018, 02:13 PM
|
#2
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South, UK
Posts: 14,218
|
+ Multiprocessing: allow autodetection of up to 32 cores/threads
Thanks!
__________________
subproject FRs click here
note: don't search for my pseudonym on the web. The "musicbynumbers" you find is not me or the name I use for my own music.
|
|
|
03-30-2018, 02:20 PM
|
#3
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South, UK
Posts: 14,218
|
Whilst I was looking at the multiprocessor settings again, I noticed that the "allow live FX multiprocessing on.." setting has a "hint" that says don't go over 4 CPUs even if you have more.
I thought the max was higher than that now on windows 10 "professional" if I recall from the last conversation in here about that?
I set mine to 14 (on a 10/20 core I9 but I did get some glitches the other day even though I only had one instrument in the actual project.
I might try 4 cores then, see how that goes..
__________________
subproject FRs click here
note: don't search for my pseudonym on the web. The "musicbynumbers" you find is not me or the name I use for my own music.
|
|
|
03-30-2018, 02:24 PM
|
#4
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,746
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by musicbynumbers
Whilst I was looking at the multiprocessor settings again, I noticed that the "allow live FX multiprocessing on.." setting has a "hint" that says don't go over 4 CPUs even if you have more.
I thought the max was higher than that now on windows 10 "professional" if I recall from the last conversation in here about that?
I set mine to 14 (on a 10/20 core I9 but I did get some glitches the other day even though I only had one instrument in the actual project.
I might try 4 cores then, see how that goes..
|
Ah yeah we should revise that hint (it also uses meaningless terminologies and stuff too).
|
|
|
03-30-2018, 03:02 PM
|
#5
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,030
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by musicbynumbers
# Notation: allow more columns of nearly-overlapping accidentals
|
Much improved. Thank you.
|
|
|
03-30-2018, 03:46 PM
|
#6
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 550
|
You guys are coding as fast as thunder strikes the ground!?
Thanks for all!
|
|
|
03-30-2018, 04:55 PM
|
#7
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South, UK
Posts: 14,218
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin
Ah yeah we should revise that hint (it also uses meaningless terminologies and stuff too).
|
...
__________________
subproject FRs click here
note: don't search for my pseudonym on the web. The "musicbynumbers" you find is not me or the name I use for my own music.
|
|
|
03-30-2018, 06:48 PM
|
#8
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: canada
Posts: 3,396
|
hey guys, just checking over those notation editor changes. Keep having problems getting zoom levels correct though, sorry bit ot but can you tell me how to get the vertical zoom handles back in the NE? thanks
https://photos.app.goo.gl/NuyauJeaPM8WPK0h2
|
|
|
03-30-2018, 07:01 PM
|
#9
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,746
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwok
hey guys, just checking over those notation editor changes. Keep having problems getting zoom levels correct though, sorry bit ot but can you tell me how to get the vertical zoom handles back in the NE? thanks
https://photos.app.goo.gl/NuyauJeaPM8WPK0h2
|
Two relevant bits:
1) Control (cmd on mac)+ mousewheel to zoom
2) View menu ->Notation view options -> Continuous view only
|
|
|
03-30-2018, 07:50 PM
|
#10
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: canada
Posts: 3,396
|
ah thanks, I toggled continuous view and behaving correctly now.
( there may be user error involved, though I do experience a bit of "wonkiness" with mousewheel zoom in the NE. Seems to zoom out fine but, I usually can't zoom back in to the same depth and have to use the scroll bar +- to get back zoomed in right. Though haven't really dug around to confirm, so will not derail, but might post about that at some point if I figure it out for sure)
edit: I think I know what it is, mousewheel is scrolling the view at the same time cmd+mousewheel is zooming
edit 2 - actually there this jumping too. I don't want to derail, but here is a small vid, if it looks wonky perfect, if not....continue on..... (all zooming in vid is with cmd+mouswheel unless you see the scrollbar zoom being tweaked)
zoom jumping:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Bj...uIWnzPruxAwv_s
Last edited by gwok; 03-30-2018 at 08:23 PM.
|
|
|
03-30-2018, 08:37 PM
|
#11
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: canada
Posts: 3,396
|
ok,
So I've bashed the NE quite a bit and I'm getting pretty good results with accidentals and note clusters. Using the same piece as all the previous pics, you can see it's quite a bit better! yay
https://photos.app.goo.gl/0Za9AEnvXkTPc6gw2
I still see quite a bit of overlapping though at different zoom levels. Sometime changing zoom levels will fix it, though sometimes it persists, or is not ideal to change zoom level (for readability)
you can see in these pics, various overlaps of rests, accidentals, bar lines etc
https://photos.app.goo.gl/hSv5bMC3P0ZdDMrh2
|
|
|
03-30-2018, 09:52 PM
|
#12
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 56
|
+ Multiprocessing: allow autodetection of up to 32 cores/threads
+ Multiprocessing: allow autodetection of up to 32 cores/threads
Thanks!
Justin Pay attention to the remarkable Samplomatic. Let him have something like Add Band as ReaEq, only for samples. This will allow you to load drums and other tools into one vst
|
|
|
03-31-2018, 12:47 AM
|
#13
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,714
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwok
I still see quite a bit of overlapping though at different zoom levels. Sometime changing zoom levels will fix it, though sometimes it persists, or is not ideal to change zoom level (for readability)
you can see in these pics, various overlaps of rests, accidentals, bar lines etc
|
In some of these pics, the spacing does indeed seem wonky. In others (I think) the problem is caused by zoom levels: If you zoom in (expand) vertically and zoom out (compress) horizontally, notes and accidentals will inevitably start to overlap.
Note size is determined by vertical zoom, since the notes have to fit precisely into the staff spaces.
Note spacing is determined by horizontal zoom, so as you zoom out, they get squashed together.
|
|
|
03-31-2018, 11:25 AM
|
#14
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: canada
Posts: 3,396
|
oh cool thanks!
maybe so, I'll check that out. Though that does start to cross over to my other point, which is (at least for me anyway) some erratic behaviour with the zooming in the NE. I often seem to get these erratic jumps trying to get to the optimal zoom. Especially when the NE is displaying multiple selected clips.
thanks though, I'm still getting used the the NE, so it's good to rule out user errors
|
|
|
03-31-2018, 09:14 PM
|
#15
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 454
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by musicbynumbers
+ Performance meter: optionally show xrun counters
|
What are "xrun" counters? I've seen them mentioned in Linux discussions but are they relevant for Windows PCs?
Chuck
|
|
|
03-31-2018, 10:46 PM
|
#16
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 4,968
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucky5p
What are "xrun" counters? I've seen them mentioned in Linux discussions but are they relevant for Windows PCs?
|
XRuns, aka buffer underruns and "crackles and pops", happens whenever the CPU is unable to give a full audio buffer to the audio hardware in time. This changelog entry means REAPER now shows how many happened in the performance meter dialog.
|
|
|
04-03-2018, 07:53 AM
|
#17
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by musicbynumbers
+ Glue: round start/end times to project samplerate [t=205043]
|
Thanks!
But... Original observation has uncovered general (consistent between all rendering types now) "shift on render" effect.
Disclaimer: I understand that is on the level of "DAW sound" holy-wars, I mean possible phase shift in 20kHz region is not really audible. At the same time, several unfortunate renderings theoretically can shift the effect into audible domain
Upper (unchanged in the second image) track is original 44.1
Middle (red in the second image) is glued copy (44.1)
Lower (blue in the second image) is glued copy with the sample rate changed (48)
In the second image, rendered version is a "shifted" copy. Glued with sample rate conversion version is interpolated. It is also slightly shifted. When rendered to 96k (not on images), different algorithm is used for the sample rate conversion (visible by HPF changes before the first not zero sample).
In general I am not in position to judge decisions for conversions (I am not a pro musician nor a pro in music DSP processing). So I have only simple proposal (FR?):
An option to align source waveform samples to current project samples when possible (sample rates match).
This way, items still can be aligned to exact MBT and/or other snap points (in general not sample aligned) while the source automatically get offset to align at the project samples. So as long as the project and audio files use the same rate, samples are always aligned to samples and glue/render/freeze will no longer need to shift/interpolate.
At the moment, "re-quantization" happens at any play/render once something is moved without "sample accuracy".
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:42 PM.
|