over the plugin Bus the first(the zero "missing"note) and the second Note note get
exact the same timestamp.
and over the Hardware bus this is not the case
(before I shortly do the test only together with extern MIDI)
... the Notes play fine on different
timestamps...
Play Start at 1.1.0
Device
TIMESTAMP IN PORT STATUS DATA1 DATA2 CHAN NOTE EVENT
zero Note
00008C22 9 -- 90 02 23 1 D -2 Note On
00008C23 9 -- 90 02 00 1 D -2 Note Off
second note
00008C4C 9 -- 90 02 38 1 D -2 Note On
00008D31 9 -- 90 02 00 1 D -2 Note Off
00008E40 9 -- 90 02 62 1 D -2 Note On
00008F25 9 -- 90 02 00 1 D -2 Note Off
00009034 9 -- 90 02 38 1 D -2 Note On
00009119 9 -- 90 02 00 1 D -2 Note Off
00009228 9 -- 90 02 62 1 D -2 Note On
000092D9 9 -- 80 02 00 1 D -2 Note Off
vs
plugin
Zero Note
[17:29:30:000461]: Dev:[VST INPUT] [Note on] No:[ 2] Val:[ 35] RAW:[90 02 23]
[17:29:30:000461]: Dev:[VST INPUT] [Note off] No:[ 2] Val:[ 0] RAW:[90 02 00]
second Note On play exactly at the same timestamp as the zero Note above (....461)
[17:29:30:000461]: Dev:[VST INPUT] [Note on] No:[ 2] Val:[ 56] RAW:[90 02 38]
[17:29:30:000639]: Dev:[VST INPUT] [Note off] No:[ 2] Val:[ 0] RAW:[90 02 00]
[17:29:30:000912]: Dev:[VST INPUT] [Note on] No:[ 2] Val:[ 98] RAW:[90 02 62]
[17:29:31:000138]: Dev:[VST INPUT] [Note off] No:[ 2] Val:[ 0] RAW:[90 02 00]
[17:29:31:000411]: Dev:[VST INPUT] [Note on] No:[ 2] Val:[ 56] RAW:[90 02 38]
[17:29:31:000637]: Dev:[VST INPUT] [Note off] No:[ 2] Val:[ 0] RAW:[90 02 00]
[17:29:31:000910]: Dev:[VST INPUT] [Note on] No:[ 2] Val:[ 98] RAW:[90 02 62]
[17:29:32:000142]: Dev:[VST INPUT] [Note off] No:[ 2] Val:[ 0] RAW:[90 02 00]
So I would say it is not only visual yes, but it is only a bug which occur with plugins(plugin bus)
and do not happen with extern Devices^^ hihi..
"Schwa" there's really no reason for a zero length note in a musical context. The length could be set to 1 tick instead.
"
Yes absolute Schwa! This is exactly what I mean.. 1 tick...
zero is really bullshit in a musical context..