Quote:
Originally Posted by Andywanders
I agree. They are nice filters but it's a shame they're not in the feedback path.
As for your questions... I'm afraid I don't know.
|
I thought they were in the feedback loop?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenakios
It's the same filters as in ReaEQ, it's possible to almost get them to null between each other. (The ReaDelay implementation seems to adjust the bandwidth/resonance slightly as a function of frequency.)
|
I tried that a few years ago and I remember it wasn't consistent so that's why I assumes the resonance changes.
But I tried it again now and I can 100% confirm.
At 13Khz, it trasnaltes to Q of 0.884 on ReaEQ, and at 9Khz it translates to 1.038.
So I guess it is a 6db/oct slope and not 12.
And yes it nulls 100%, even though reaper will round up to only 2 digits after the decimal point, it's only visual and the value you type in stays exact.
So I guess I'm gonna keep use ReaDelay as a filter because it the Q change cant be replicated elsewhere!