Quote:
Originally Posted by Fergler
Not exactly...
trackspacer is 32 bands of multiband compression, but each band is reacting to the same frequencies from the source track. So if band 100hz-150hz is compressing it's because there's a lot of 100-150hz in the source material. This is much more complex to route vs what you've done there.
You'd have to frequency split the track into 32 bands or desired amount and route each of those on separate channels.
Probably something easily coded in JS mind you. I've wanted one for years. I own trackspacer and it's controls are infuriatingly limited for the potential power...
|
thanks.
that might be what it's doing but it's hard for me to hear the difference. perhaps i would on certain material. seems for all the trouble it's worth paying for it. looks like it's about 75 USD.
I've done some coding but not sure i want to take up another language...never done any coding for audio. mostly python over the last few years.
i'm not infuriated by trackspacer....yet. i like the simplicity of it so far.