WALTER: how several combinators logic works?

[gapalil001]

i try to understand how does several combinators interacts with values in brackets
by color i marked elements that i guess affects left to right

set tcp.element h>somebp{2} + 2 * 1 - 4 / 2 [n1 n2 n3 n4 0 0 0 0]

or 

set tcp.blabla + + [n1 n2 n3 n4] [n1 n2 n3 n4]

what is right?

[White Tie]

Neither. See my answer here.

set tcp.blabla + [n1 n2 n3 n4] [n1 n2 n3 n4]

Is I think what you want. More precisely:

+ [1 2 3 4] [5 6 7 5]

is

[1+5 2+6 3+7 4+5]

[gapalil001]

thank you! it works in my theme from the beginning. maybe whole my rtconfig is builded with it

Originally Posted by White Tie

+ [1 2 3 4] [5 6 7 5]

is

[1+5 2+6 3+7 4+5]

but i am asking about situations when the combinator is not single but several, like here (def6 random examples):

	set phaseHide_h	             + + + * scale 4 element_h tcp.solo{1} tcp.solo{3}
        set master.mcp.volume        - + + * scale [69 0 21] [0 stretch_sec 0 stretch_sec] [0 master.mcp.volume.label{3}] [0 0 0 master.mcp.volume.label{3}]

sorry if i ask a lot of questions, i just want to prepare some cool stuff for the next update

[White Tie]

That's what I meant by see my answer here. Its just polish notation.

set phaseHide_h	             + + + * scale 4 element_h tcp.solo{1} tcp.solo{3}

is

set phaseHide_h   + 
                     + 
                        + 
                           * scale 4
                           element_h 
                        tcp.solo{1} 
                     tcp.solo{3}

or in non-polish 

(scale * 4) + element_h + tcp.solo{1} + tcp.solo{3}

Which is a profoundly boring and non-clever line of walter, right?

I think you need to stop looking at the default theme walter as a learning guide, its not a repository of arcane knowledge. Its just the same simple stuff but used in a complicated way, its not going to teach you "how WALTER works", its going to teach you "how did WT use WALTER once, in a different circumstance, and possibly not optimally?"

[gapalil001]

Originally Posted by White Tie

That's what I meant by see my answer here. Its just polish notation.

thank you! will mess with it!