09-17-2021, 06:50 PM | #1 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 175
|
Examples of binaural export using different plugins
I wanted to explore binaural audio, with the aim of converting my stereo mixes to something more immersive, to be listened on headphones. To this end, I started looking at different options, and I found that mixing plugins from different brands sound better to me.
Below, I put 4 clips using the same stereo track (a stem of recorded acoustic drum kit, with reverb baked in it, panned -/+ 90°) so you can compare different plugins and associations of plugins: https://soundcloud.com/sebastien-guy...l-plugins-test 1. Full Sparta chain, ambiENC followed by ambBIN (both set to 7th order ambisonics) 2. IEM stereo encoder (set to 7th order ambisonics), followed by the Sparta ambiBIN binaural decoder (set to 7th order ambisonics) 3. DearVR Pro, set to encode AmbiX TOA, followed by the Sparta ambiBIN binaural decoder (set to TOA) 4. DearVR Pro, direct export from its binaural export setting What's your opinion? I really dislike 4., but I like 3. a lot. Options 1. and 2. sound a bit different because the encoders are different, but they are quite close because the binaural decoder is the same. Last edited by sguyader; 09-17-2021 at 06:58 PM. |
09-17-2021, 11:26 PM | #2 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South, UK
Posts: 14,214
|
Great idea.
I'll give it a listen later when in the studio and let you know!
__________________
subproject FRs click here note: don't search for my pseudonym on the web. The "musicbynumbers" you find is not me or the name I use for my own music. |
09-19-2021, 11:03 AM | #3 | |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
So here, it boils down to how the encoders deal with stereo. Slight gain differences. |
|
09-19-2021, 07:41 PM | #4 | |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
I still puzzled by the results from DearVR Pro: the encoder/panner is really nice and gives me a stronger sense of depth and spatial separation (the instrument sounds less in your face). However its binaural decoder really sucks (at least to my ears). There's a lot to explore with the Sparta ambiBIN decoder. I found a source of HRIR's, and the following clip is the same drum loop, with a KU100 HRIR instead of the default one, and "phase simplification" preprocessing instead of the default "diffuse-field EQ" setting: https://soundcloud.com/sebastien-guy...0-phasesimplif That one sound really good to me: deep, full, spacious, "alive" |
|
09-20-2021, 10:14 AM | #5 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 170
|
http://www.radio.uqam.ca/divers/ambi_encoding.png Mono encoding, 30° azimuth, 30° elevation. The encoding is identical. There are subtle differences, related probably to the math library used in each encoder and how it deals with degree/radian conversion, precision of PI, precision of sine and cosine, etc. |
09-20-2021, 10:32 AM | #6 | |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
|
|
09-21-2021, 07:49 AM | #7 | |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
The formula for that channel is sqrt(5/8)*cos(3*azimuth)*(cos(elevation))^3. http://pcfarina.eng.unipr.it/Aurora/...t_formulas.htm So difference probably due to different math libraries and how they deal with degree/radian conversion, precision of PI, precision of cosine, etc. Last edited by Kewl; 09-21-2021 at 03:39 PM. |
|
09-21-2021, 07:58 AM | #8 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 170
|
That being said, maybe the perceptual result would be closer if you compared SPARTA AmbiENC to IEM MultiEncoder, rather than the IEM StereoEncoder. The StereoEncoder has to deal with Left and Right summing: the AmbiENC and MultiEncoder, I believe, do not.
|
09-21-2021, 01:38 PM | #9 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 175
|
I think I'm done with comparisons. For now I'll stick with Sparta ambiENC and ambiBIN, except maybe when I want to automate some movement of the tracks, as I found that ambiENC doesn't write the automation envelopes when I click and move the object in ambiENC (it works with the IEM encoder).
|
10-15-2021, 03:30 AM | #11 | |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Düsseldorf
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
There must be something wrong with the setup in example 4. This is not our binaural sound You can listen to some examples on Plugin Alliance and also get a free 14-day trial there, if you want to check dearVR PRO: https://www.plugin-alliance.com/en/p...earvr_pro.html Best, Peter |
|
10-18-2021, 06:57 AM | #12 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia (originally from Geelong)
Posts: 5,598
|
I prefer 3 most. It seems to sound most natural to me.
Having said that, I have yet to find any binaural encoder that convinces me. Perhaps I have a very unusual HRIR profile. I've tried many encoders from many sources but the only thing I've found convincing are actual recordings done with a KU100. Even the encoders using KU100 impulse responses don't sound convincing to me.
__________________
|
10-19-2021, 10:06 PM | #13 | |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 209
|
Quote:
Would Dear VR be open to adding ambisonic inputs to the DearVR Pro plugin? I was surprised to find out (after purchasing) that it sums the input signals to mono--I had expected to be able to use it as a true ambisonic reverb. Having inputs for a diversity of formats (stereo, ambix b-format, fuma, surround, cube, etc.) would make this tool considerably more powerful. Could I also request support for other VBAP spatial formats like Mach 1/SPS? Last edited by BPBaker; 10-20-2021 at 06:28 PM. |
|
10-20-2021, 01:24 PM | #14 | |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
Thanks for chiming in. I actually already own a license for DearVR Pro (and DearVR Monitor as well). I'm surprised too as I really that the demo sounds on your website sound good, but on my system it doesn't. And I don't know what could be wrong on my side. By the way, I saw a video on Michael Wagner's channel today where he uses DearVR monitor for monitoring a Dolby Atmos mix, and again the DearVR render sounds more coloured than the others. Finally while you're here, it would be great if the DearVR plugins could be updated. Not only they are still not native for Mac M1 chips, but also on my Big Sur système there are bad graphical glitches on buttons and sliders. |
|
10-20-2021, 01:33 PM | #15 | |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
|
|
10-22-2021, 07:48 AM | #16 | |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Düsseldorf
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
Thanks for your feedback. I will add this to our list of requested features. Of course I can't guarantee any specific feature for future updates. Stay tuned! Greetings |
|
10-22-2021, 07:50 AM | #17 | |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Düsseldorf
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
Maybe something is wrong with the routing. Could you please contact our support team (support@dear-reality.com) and tell us about your problem there. We can better assist you that way. Best, Peter |
|
10-30-2021, 07:56 PM | #18 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 175
|
Thank you Peter, I sent an email to address you provided.
I'm afraid it's not a routing issue. The binaural output is just 2 channels, there's no difficulty setting this out. As you can see on the attached frequency spectrum, the binauralizer in DearVR Pro introduces strong dips and peaks from mid to high frequencies (green curve), and that's what sounds so coloured. See how it compares to different chains: - DearVR Pro stereo output into DearVR Monitor (orange curve) - DearVR Pro direct stereo output (blue curve) - Sparta ambisonics to binaural chain (pink curve) - no plugin (direct stereo output) white curve Since the spectrum analyzer plugin (Voxengo Span PLus) is placed right after DearVR Pro, I don't see how it could be a routing issue. Last edited by sguyader; 01-18-2024 at 05:38 PM. |
11-04-2021, 09:39 PM | #19 |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 169
|
Number 5 is my fav, then number 3. Listening on AKG K240 aniversary editions.
Had a listen to both Peter's (Soundlcoud/PA site) and I agree that the full DearVR pro chain has obvious dips and things going on in the mids. The examples in the PA site clearly show that for foley/atmos/fx these tonal changes dont matter so much and the trade off (on a signle track basis) is worth it for the effect. But for music...meh, they're all not fantastic, and that concerns me as I'm just about to start mixing my album for immersive. The least comb filtered sounding was number5, then 3 in those tests so thats what my reason for it. I don't have a KU100 so I would be exploring the chain in 3 myself and trying to better that.
__________________
filmsonic.com.au |
11-05-2021, 04:43 AM | #20 | |
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|