|
|
|
01-30-2016, 07:03 PM
|
#1
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,859
|
Kemper profiling amp software
Yea, you wish.
Seriously though, why hasn't something like this been implemented in software? Listening to demos, the Kemper thing sounds much better than any other amp simulation out there. After listening to alot of demos, I do notice a very samey, kind of flat sound to the various profiles (maybe it has to do with the reverb slathered onto every demo), but it still sounds way over and above anything else available (Edit: except Axe-Fx2).
Is the Kemper box using a ton of dsp horsepower? Anyone know how it actually works?
__________________
It's time to take a stand against the synthesizer.
Last edited by brainwreck; 02-01-2016 at 05:25 PM.
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 07:39 PM
|
#2
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,696
|
http://www.guitar-muse.com/kemper-pr...-amp-2949-2949
This gives a little insight but its a pretty closely guarded secret. I think fractals axefx2 dsps are technically more powerful, but who cares when they sound great
I dont think they are clearly above and beyond everything though. The fractals sound awesome, and some of the helix and amplifire demos are pretty strong.
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 07:49 PM
|
#3
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,859
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thequietroom
http://www.guitar-muse.com/kemper-pr...-amp-2949-2949
This gives a little insight but its a pretty closely guarded secret. I think fractals axefx2 dsps are technically more powerful, but who cares when they sound great
I dont think they are clearly above and beyond everything though. The fractals sound awesome, and some of the helix and amplifire demos are pretty strong.
|
I haven't heard demos of that other gear that sounds anything like classic amps without a bunch of fx doo doo. Got any links to anything like that? From what I have heard, if you want something that gets very close to dry amp sounds, Kemper has no competition.
__________________
It's time to take a stand against the synthesizer.
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 08:28 PM
|
#4
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,696
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainwreck
I haven't heard demos of that other gear that sounds anything like classic amps without a bunch of fx doo doo. Got any links to anything like that? From what I have heard, if you want something that gets very close to dry amp sounds, Kemper has no competition.
|
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d7fywAjyCxk
This demos a few amps with no fx
If you think the kemper is better, its all good. Im not going to try and change your mind. I have a friend that has both units. I was lucky enough to be able to test out an axefx. To my ear they are both great units.
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 08:50 PM
|
#5
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,696
|
http://youtu.be/7sWIP4SA6YQ
Some fx some pretty dry on this demo
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 10:24 PM
|
#6
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,859
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thequietroom
|
Compare that to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ewmUlOuKB4
Which one sounds more like an amp to you?
The Fractal clip sounds really hard and kind of harsh and scratchy to me (I'm listening on headphones).
Edit: Still listening and comparing. The Fractal sounds very artifial to me, like I would expext from a software amp sim.
__________________
It's time to take a stand against the synthesizer.
Last edited by brainwreck; 01-30-2016 at 10:31 PM.
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 08:50 PM
|
#7
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,859
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thequietroom
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d7fywAjyCxk
This demos a few amps with no fx
If you think the kemper is better, its all good. Im not going to try and change your mind. I have a friend that has both units. I was lucky enough to be able to test out an axefx. To my ear they are both great units.
|
No offense meant to you for providing the link, but bah... typical high gain, and clean with slathered on effects. It seems that 99% of people who demo gear are into metal, and half of those are into hair metal sounds with cheesy digital chorus, delay, and reverb slathered onto everything. Apologies for the rant.
__________________
It's time to take a stand against the synthesizer.
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 09:43 PM
|
#8
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,859
|
__________________
It's time to take a stand against the synthesizer.
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 07:50 PM
|
#9
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: In the armpit of the USA
Posts: 251
|
The only thing close to an actual software implementation is using Bias Amp Professional. It allows you to do a tone match of a live or recorded signal. You have to pre-setup an amp similar first though, then it dials everything in. From what I've heard so far, it's been pretty close to the original tones it was matching.
I opted for the Bias F Professional though since it has pretty much all the same amps plus all kinds of effects.
Here's some examples: https://www.youtube.com/results?sear...+will+it+match
__________________
Registered Reaper Owner and lover of free VST's
Last edited by silar; 01-30-2016 at 08:03 PM.
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 08:10 PM
|
#10
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,696
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by silar
The only thing close to an actual software implementation is using Bias Amp Professional. It allows you to do a tone match of a live or recorded signal. You have to pre-setup an amp similar first though, then it dials everything in. From what I've heard so far, it's been pretty close to the original tones it was matching.
I opted for the Bias F Professional though since it has pretty much all the same amps plus all kinds of effects.
Here's some examples: https://www.youtube.com/results?sear...+will+it+match
|
This sounds a lot like the tone match in the axefx. I think kempers doing something different in profiling. I doubt well see them do a software version. They have something pretty awesome going and it would get cracked and copied pretty quick if it was in software form. Just my opinion anyway
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 08:25 PM
|
#11
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,859
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thequietroom
They have something pretty awesome going and it would get cracked and copied pretty quick if it was in software form. Just my opinion anyway
|
If a plugin version was $200, where the hardware box is $2000, I think they would make more money by way of volume, even with some amount of piracy. Maybe the hardware platform also servers to discourage reverse engineering, though.
__________________
It's time to take a stand against the synthesizer.
|
|
|
01-31-2016, 12:34 PM
|
#12
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Near a big lake
Posts: 3,943
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainwreck
If a plugin version was $200, where the hardware box is $2000, I think they would make more money by way of volume, even with some amount of piracy.
|
Perhaps. But if sales of a plugin version aren't what they'd hoped, and it hurts the sales of the hardware units (effectively competing with themselves), it could be worse than not taking advantage of having a plugin version. Plus: then they'd have to support multiple possible computer DAW configurations/OSes instead of just supporting their own hardware. I can understand their reluctance to make a plugin version.
As for the Axe-FX sounding "more fake" than the Kemper, I don't hear that. Unfortunately someone can pull up a clip of a Kemper they like with a certain profile/player/etc. and say "yeah but what about this" and since there are no similar Axe-FX clips (currently anyway), it's assumed the Axe-FX "can't sound as good" in that way. Like any amp clip, the sound depends on the entire signal chain (and the player). The signal chain in the Axe-FX consists of the various blocks including the speaker sim block, which is a make-or-break sort of thing. Without the speaker sim you prefer, you'd never know if the amp sim is going to make you happy. With the Kemper, the profiles (generally) include the speaker that was used at the time the profile was made. Someone "got that sound in the room", liked it, tested it before profiling it, and then profiled it (to the extent the profile mimics the sound). If someone chooses to use "Amp A" with "Cab B" in the Axe-FX because of his preferences, whereas you might've preferred "Cab A", you won't hear something quite like what you want.
Both units are very good at emulating the sound of a recorded amp. It's more about what you do with either of them, and if you're happy with the workflow of either device. The same can be said for some plugins, including some free plugins. With the right setup, you can use free plugins and get sound every bit as good as anything from a hardware amp sim. You may not want to work that way though, for various reasons.
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 09:05 PM
|
#13
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 6,551
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainwreck
Yea, you wish.
Seriously though, why hasn't something like this been implemented in software?
Is the Kemper box using a ton of dsp horsepower? Anyone know how it actually works?
|
The profiling process is patented, so there's that, and I think they've said that a software version isn't in the cards specifically because of piracy.
In other news, I <3 my Kemper so, so much. Can't even remember the last time I plugged my 6505 in.
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 10:44 PM
|
#14
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,859
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lokasenna
The profiling process is patented, so there's that, and I think they've said that a software version isn't in the cards specifically because of piracy.
In other news, I <3 my Kemper so, so much. Can't even remember the last time I plugged my 6505 in.
|
Lucky man. So I take it that you're using it for metal? If I were playing metal, I think I could be ok with something from the software amp sim pool, but definitely not for clean to crunchy sounds.
__________________
It's time to take a stand against the synthesizer.
|
|
|
01-30-2016, 11:31 PM
|
#15
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 6,919
|
Hey guys,
Let me share my favorite Kemper video with you...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHpWWcbNHrk.
Enjoy.
__________________
Peace...
bluzkat
|
|
|
01-31-2016, 12:06 AM
|
#16
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,696
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluzkat
|
Some lovely playing there
|
|
|
01-31-2016, 02:17 PM
|
#17
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 6,551
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainwreck
Lucky man. So I take it that you're using it for metal? If I were playing metal, I think I could be ok with something from the software amp sim pool, but definitely not for clean to crunchy sounds.
|
All metal, all the time. I've never been able to get satisfactory sounds out of software amps, although I think it's mostly the cabinet modelling that I don't like.
Once in a while if I'm bored I'll fiddle around with SRV sounds, but I'm pretty terrible at clean playing so it doesn't last long. Maybe if I ever put my Frankenstrat back together.
More sexy Kemper:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TUI5gkHBu0
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:12 PM.
|