Go Back   Cockos Incorporated Forums > REAPER Forums > REAPER General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-2018, 05:02 PM   #41
TheMaartian
Human being with feelings
 
TheMaartian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Arcachon, France
Posts: 435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by batcat View Post
The meaning of the word blurry is subjective, so it might be just me.
But when I compare the text of dpmeter 2 and 3 side by side, I much prefer the text of dpm 2.
It looks sharper, darker and less dull on my screen compared to the latest version of dpm3.
Please suggest a good quick image upload page so I can post a side by side comparsion image.
Edit: here is a link to the image
https://i.postimg.cc/28q8Y7T5/DPMeter-comparison.jpg
IMGUR is great. I have a free account, and haven't had any need to upgrade.

https://imgur.com/
__________________
Intel i9, 32 GB RAM, 7 TB SSD; Win 11 Pro; PreSonus Studio 1810c
Studio One 6 Pro; MuseScore 4; Melodyne 5 Studio; Acoustica Pro 7; Reaper 7
Gig Performer 4; NI S61 MK3; Focal Shape 65; Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro, DT 770 Pro
TheMaartian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2018, 11:48 PM   #42
TBProAudio
Human being with feelings
 
TBProAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by batcat View Post
The meaning of the word blurry is subjective, so it might be just me.
But when I compare the text of dpmeter 2 and 3 side by side, I much prefer the text of dpm 2.
It looks sharper, darker and less dull on my screen compared to the latest version of dpm3.
Please suggest a good quick image upload page so I can post a side by side comparsion image.
Edit: here is a link to the image
https://i.postimg.cc/28q8Y7T5/DPMeter-comparison.jpg

Yes, some texts look "lighter". Let me see what we can do here :-)
__________________
www.tbproaudio.de
TBProAudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2018, 08:41 AM   #43
TBProAudio
Human being with feelings
 
TBProAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 643
Default

V 1.3.1:

- GUI: small fixes

- GUI: VST2 resize fix for Audition
__________________
www.tbproaudio.de
TBProAudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2019, 11:33 PM   #44
TBProAudio
Human being with feelings
 
TBProAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 643
Default Update

1.3.4:
- Mouse handling consolidated: shift mouse drag slows down parameter change, ctrl mouse drag accelerates parameter change
- Fix for automation data processing
1.3.3:
- WaveLab: DAW sync fix
1.3.2:
- Preset manager: update
__________________
www.tbproaudio.de
TBProAudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2019, 02:03 AM   #45
sinkmusic
Human being with feelings
 
sinkmusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: decepticon mothership in a hidden place inside a mountain
Posts: 3,754
Default

Thank you for the regular updates, TBProaudio.
sinkmusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2020, 01:27 PM   #46
kfj452
Human being with feelings
 
kfj452's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 39
Default

So I am a little confused about the units here. AES17 says:

Quote:
3.4
full-scale signal level FS

signal amplitude relative to the full-scale amplitude expressed in decibels, full scale or percent, full scale

NOTE Because the definition of full scale is based on a sine wave, it will be possible with square-wave test signals to read as much as + 3,01 dB FS. Square-wave signals at this level are not recommended because tilt or overshoot introduced by any filtering operations will cause clipping of the signal.
Quote:
3.3.1
decibels, full scale dB FS

amplitude expressed as a level in decibels relative to full-scale amplitude (20 times the common logarithm of the amplitude over the full-scale amplitude)
So:
  • If a sine wave has peaks at -14 dBFS, then the RMS level should also be -14 dBFS.
  • If a square wave has peaks at -17 dBFS, then the RMS level should be -14 dBFS.
But in dpMeter4 the RMS value seems to be offset by 3 dB:






I have channel config=Left, so it should just be looking at one channel and measuring the level, correct?


It seems you are actually measuring in dBov, not dBFS.

  • Full-scale sine wave = 0 dBFS = -3 dBov = 0 dBTP
  • Full-scale square wave = +3 dBFS = 0 dBov = a bit more than 0 dBTP due to intersample peaks.
Also, could the RMS Mode tooltip be improved?



The manual says it has to do with the way channels are combined to provide a single reading, but the tooltip and labels in the software don't say anything about channels.

Also "Sum/Average + 3dB/Average" looks kind of like a math formula with divisions in it, rather than 3 different options separated by slashes. Maybe vertical bars instead? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
kfj452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2020, 10:17 PM   #47
TBProAudio
Human being with feelings
 
TBProAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kfj452 View Post
So I am a little confused about the units here. AES17 says:

So:
  • If a sine wave has peaks at -14 dBFS, then the RMS level should also be -14 dBFS.
  • If a square wave has peaks at -17 dBFS, then the RMS level should be -14 dBFS.
But in dpMeter4 the RMS value seems to be offset by 3 dB:






I have channel config=Left, so it should just be looking at one channel and measuring the level, correct?


It seems you are actually measuring in dBov, not dBFS.

  • Full-scale sine wave = 0 dBFS = -3 dBov = 0 dBTP
  • Full-scale square wave = +3 dBFS = 0 dBov = a bit more than 0 dBTP due to intersample peaks.
Also, could the RMS Mode tooltip be improved?



The manual says it has to do with the way channels are combined to provide a single reading, but the tooltip and labels in the software don't say anything about channels.

Also "Sum/Average + 3dB/Average" looks kind of like a math formula with divisions in it, rather than 3 different options separated by slashes. Maybe vertical bars instead? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

We don't think that dpMeter4 is wrong. If you need/want AES17 you need to use RMS Mode "AVG+3".
We will revise toolt-tip test, thank you for this.
__________________
www.tbproaudio.de
TBProAudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2020, 08:44 AM   #48
kfj452
Human being with feelings
 
kfj452's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBProAudio View Post
We don't think that dpMeter4 is wrong. If you need/want AES17 you need to use RMS Mode "AVG+3".
We will revise toolt-tip test, thank you for this.
Could you change the labels to "dBFS" and "dBov" instead?
kfj452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2020, 08:55 AM   #49
TBProAudio
Human being with feelings
 
TBProAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kfj452 View Post
Could you change the labels to "dBFS" and "dBov" instead?

Hmm, why should we do this?
RMS mode is calibrated to 0 dBFS.
__________________
www.tbproaudio.de
TBProAudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2020, 09:23 AM   #50
kfj452
Human being with feelings
 
kfj452's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBProAudio View Post
Hmm, why should we do this?
RMS mode is calibrated to 0 dBFS.
But... it's not... That's what I'm saying. Do I not have it configured correctly?

If I put a 0 dBFS sine wave tone into dpMeter4, in RMS mode, the peak measurement says 0 dBFS, or 0 dBTP, which are correct, but the RMS measurement says "-3 dBFS" which is not correct:


This is single channel, so the "RMS mode" drop-down doesn't affect it.

It should either say "-3 dBov" or "0 dBFS":
  • a full-scale sine wave is 0 dBFS or -3 dBov
  • a full-scale square wave is +3 dBFS or 0 dBov
https://www.sis.se/api/document/preview/571704/
Quote:
3.10
full-scale amplitude
FS
amplitude of a 997 Hz sinusoid whose peak positive sample just reaches positive digital full-scale
Quote:
3.4
decibels full-scale
dBFS
the r.m.s. amplitude of a sinusoid described in 3.10 is defined as 0 dB FS
https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub....F-E&type=items

Quote:
8.7 The unit "dBov"

The level of a tone with a digital amplitude (peak value) of xover is therefore L= –3.01 dBov.
kfj452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2020, 09:55 AM   #51
TBProAudio
Human being with feelings
 
TBProAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kfj452 View Post
This is single channel, so the "RMS mode" drop-down doesn't affect it.

Well this is obviously not true. dpmeter4 RMS mode matters:

SUM: sum of all root mean square (RMS) values

AVG: avg of all root mean square (RMS) values


AVG+3: avg of all root mean square (RMS) values +3dB according AES17


In any case: we will change naming "AVG+3" to "AES17".
__________________
www.tbproaudio.de
TBProAudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2020, 11:05 AM   #52
kfj452
Human being with feelings
 
kfj452's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBProAudio View Post
Well this is obviously not true. dpmeter4 RMS mode matters:
I mean that I have Ch Config set to "Left", and Mode set to "RMS", so it's just measuring a single channel and I want to measure the RMS level (and A-weighted RMS level) of a single signal, and not deal with stereo vs multichannel vs whatever.

If I change "RMS mode" button to "sum" or "avg", the measurement is the same, since there's only one channel. Shouldn't it read 0 dBFS in this case?
kfj452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2020, 09:52 PM   #53
TBProAudio
Human being with feelings
 
TBProAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kfj452 View Post
I mean that I have Ch Config set to "Left", and Mode set to "RMS", so it's just measuring a single channel and I want to measure the RMS level (and A-weighted RMS level) of a single signal, and not deal with stereo vs multichannel vs whatever.

If I change "RMS mode" button to "sum" or "avg", the measurement is the same, since there's only one channel. Shouldn't it read 0 dBFS in this case?

OK: why not set RMS mode to "AVG+3"?
Thank you.
__________________
www.tbproaudio.de
TBProAudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 11:09 AM   #54
kfj452
Human being with feelings
 
kfj452's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBProAudio View Post
OK: why not set RMS mode to "AVG+3"?
Thank you.
Yes, adding a 3 dB offset causes it to report the correct number, but I mean that the unit labels are not correct. When RMS mode is set to "SUM" or "AVG", it says "-3 dBFS":



which is not correct. If you want it to be offset by -3 dB like this, it should not say "dBFS", since that's not how dBFS is defined. It could say "-3 dBov" though, since that unit is defined with a reference that is 3 dB higher.

Like when you turn on Offset, the unit changes to "dB":



which is correct, since it's no longer referenced to full-scale. (It could also be labeled "dBr" to highlight that it's a relative measurement)
kfj452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 10:06 PM   #55
TBProAudio
Human being with feelings
 
TBProAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kfj452 View Post
Y... It could say "-3 dBov" though, since that unit is defined with a reference that is 3 dB higher.

Thank you, we will change this with next release.
__________________
www.tbproaudio.de
TBProAudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2020, 08:25 AM   #56
TBProAudio
Human being with feelings
 
TBProAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 643
Default

Update to 4.3.3:
- FIX: RMS mode "AVG+3" changed to "AES17"






Sprache erkennenundefined
undefined











Die Sound-Funktion ist auf 200 Zeichen begrenzt


Optionen : Geschichte : Feedback : DonateSchließen
__________________
www.tbproaudio.de
TBProAudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2020, 07:11 PM   #57
kfj452
Human being with feelings
 
kfj452's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBProAudio View Post
Update to 4.3.3:
- FIX: RMS mode "AVG+3" changed to "AES17"

Thank you for changing it! But... the units are reversed. :/ In AES17 mode it should say "dBFS", and in "sum" and "avg" modes it should say "dBov".

  • Full-scale sine wave is 0 dBFS (AES17, IEC 61606, ITU-T P.38x)
  • Full-scale sine wave is -3 dBov (ITU-T G.100.1)


kfj452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.