The time has come! Per item FX! (DONE) - Page 4

Tallisman · 10-22-2007, 01:29 PM

Per item sends is a killer idea... these would, of course be in addition to per/item FX. Per/item Sends would also be, by default Post Per/item FX (but perhaps a pre-per-item FX could make its way in there too.... I feel a new FR coming on....

http://www.cockos.com/forum/showthre...367#post122367

stringycheesey · 10-22-2007, 01:41 PM

Can't a person just create multiple tracks in a folder, move things around and add FX as needed? I mean we have unlimited tracks.

Tallisman · 10-22-2007, 01:52 PM

could do... but this is cool! http://www.cockos.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14223
and it makes for smaller track counts, which for the multiple-monitor impaired is a big thing

.t

Lawrence · 10-22-2007, 02:29 PM

Not sure I get all that Tall but wouldn't it be similar if each item on one track could be assigned to a seperate channel within the track? Part A on 1/2 Part B on 3/4?

Send Part B to an effect and return it on 5/6? Or is that too convoluted?

My vote is to take care of the regular stuff (automation, midi love, more controllers, MTC sync) before adding more exotic features like per track FX.

Tallisman · 10-22-2007, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lawrence

Not sure I get all that Tall but wouldn't it be similar if each item on one track could be assigned to a seperate channel within the track? Part A on 1/2 Part B on 3/4?

Send Part B to an effect and return it on 5/6? Or is that too convoluted?

My vote is to take care of the regular stuff (automation, midi love, more controllers, MTC sync) before adding more exotic features like per track FX.

lawrence see here for a bad, yet exciting description of what I mean: http://www.cockos.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14223

it seems to me like it will address a number of issues that have recently surfaced.

.t

quasar333666 · 10-22-2007, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lawrence

Not sure I get all that Tall but wouldn't it be similar if each item on one track could be assigned to a seperate channel within the track? Part A on 1/2 Part B on 3/4?

Send Part B to an effect and return it on 5/6? Or is that too convoluted?

My vote is to take care of the regular stuff (automation, midi love, more controllers, MTC sync) before adding more exotic features like per track FX.

For me, and many others, per track efx would be da bomb! I see it as an essential feature for many music creation activists. I have quite a few friends who would switch over to reaper if they had this feature. (It's standard fare in Cubendo)...

peace

Xenakios · 10-22-2007, 08:43 PM

Surely you are talking about per-ITEM-fx, eh?

-X

quasar333666 · 10-22-2007, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xenakios

Surely you are talking about per-ITEM-fx, eh?

-X

Oops, you're right!

Superfly76 · 11-02-2007, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sebas777

One more idea: FX icon - available for every item, but only if the master FX icon is on (to avoid clutter).

This feature request gets a big +1 from me. This is a feature that I miss from Tracktion. Although I own a license, it is keeping me from completely moving over to the Reaper.

Superfly76 · 11-02-2007, 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stringycheesey

Can't a person just create multiple tracks in a folder, move things around and add FX as needed? I mean we have unlimited tracks.

There are quite a few effects that self oscilate (generate noise when there isn't any audio feeding it) that you wouldn't want running the whole time.

Xenakios · 11-03-2007, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superfly76

There are quite a few effects that self oscilate (generate noise when there isn't any audio feeding it) that you wouldn't want running the whole time.

Reaper also seems to run fx and thus consume CPU regardless of if there is actual audio playing from audio files on a track...Manually automating bypass is not a convenient solution for that!

(It could be, if the automation envelopes were better and easier to handle, but well oh, that's another subject...)

Per-item FX NOW!

-X

S-N-S · 12-12-2007, 04:30 PM

it would be so cool,hope this will come SOOOOOON++++1

PitchSlap · 01-22-2008, 04:08 PM

This is probably the biggest advantage of Magix DAWs. Such a wonderful feature. I would welcome it in Reaper +1.

Quote:

Unique Object-oriented Editing

As an enhancement to the traditional concept of mixer-supported editing of complete tracks, all versions offer countless possibilities for direct real-time sample editing. Recorded audio tracks can thus be cut into as many objects as you wish.
Every object can be edited with individual fades and effects, such as Equalizer, Timestretching, Pitchshifting or plugins. Sequoia also offers Aux-Sends on the object level, the well-known linearphase mastering effects, and a widely variable signal flow.

Thor · 01-25-2008, 10:50 AM

Keeping it warm.

pr item fx: +1
pr item sends: +1
and multichannel filesupport/routing: +5 :-)

Keep up the good work.

T

sebas777 · 01-26-2008, 10:57 PM

One more bump to keep it grooving. +++1

PS. Thank you Superfly76 for recalling the screeshot

!

JasonTheron · 01-30-2008, 11:13 AM

For the FR Tracker: !group "Per-Item FX"

JasonTheron · 02-01-2008, 03:05 PM

!done - Woooohooooooo!!!