View Single Post
Old 08-16-2019, 04:17 PM   #121
Geoff Waddington
Human being with feelings
 
Geoff Waddington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adXok View Post
Music style is not the subject of this discussion.
Jazz, flamenco, mongolian gurgle... whatever.

What this thread is all about is (and it is written in its title):
music notation, music theory
(and nomenclature)

Jazz is nothing but a niche music style, as it is the case with death metal or micro-tonal music.

I believe I pointed out enough facts about the discrepancies in the so called modern (western?) music notation, nomenclature, hence - the theory as well following those elements.

So my theory is, backed up with proofs (see above), that this "system" is inconsistent to say the least.

The title says "How to revamp the ancient music notation and music theory system which is flawed?"


Who ever said it is one system ?

This is where, in my opinion, the argument doesn't stand.

Quote:
Music style is not the subject of this discussion.
Jazz, flamenco, mongolian gurgle... whatever
Only if you restrict yourself to believe there is and should be one system.

Quote:
So my theory is, backed up with proofs (see above), that this "system" is inconsistent to say the least.
Once again only if you believe there is and should be one system.

As well as Jazz and Classical, there is also the Nashville number system, and many other suitable systems.

Every play a gig ?

I've played thousands using each system , and just as importantly, no notation at all, complete reliance on ears, and all of the systems have served me well.

I understand the idea of rationalization, IMHO it simply doesn't apply here -- YMMV
__________________
To install you need the CSI Software and Support Files
For installation instructions and documentation see the Wiki
Donate -- via PayPal to waddingtongeoff@gmail.com
Geoff Waddington is offline   Reply With Quote