View Single Post
Old 11-13-2018, 09:53 AM   #4
JSMastering
Human being with feelings
 
JSMastering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 212
Default

I've been looking into a new computer build. And it looks like 8th or 9th gen intel is the way to go, though there are a few reasons why 8th gen is probably going to be better (mostly that on 9th, the i7s dropped hyperthreading) for no real benefit, and the i9-9900k runs pretty hot, is hard to find, and is overpriced.

If you're not on a tight budget, look at something like this to start.

i7-8700 or 8700K (ScanProAudio has done some CPU testing with commentary that's probably worth reading)

z390 motherboard (will support 9th gen CPUs in case you upgrade). I'm looking at ASUS and AsRock specifically because they're the ones that include DP output for integrated graphics...a lot of the others drop it.

16-32GB of DDR4 3200MHz RAM (lowest CAS latency you can afford; I've had a lot of luck with G.Skill)

Samsung 860 Evo boot drive

Samsung 860 Evo storage drive (unless you actually need > 2TB, but in that case I'd still just buy more SSDs...spinning platters are for network storage for backups and nothing else at this point)

Sedna PCIe SATA III adapter for the boot drive. It actually makes a difference vs motheboard SATA ports as long as you use one of the first 2 x16 slots for it...on my computer it was about a 60-80% improvement across everything but # of random IOPS; it also simplifies cabling...totally worth it for $50...there's a $100 version that adds another 3 SATA connections via cables that could still give a benefit if you need several faster drives. The reason is that the motherboard SATA connectors run through the chipset and essentially share 4 PCIe lanes with onboard USB, network, and some other stuff. Using a PCIe SATA interface actually lets the SSD run at full speed instead of limiting a 6Gbps drive to ~4Gbps under a best case scenario. Going NVMe, OTOH, doesn't seem like it's worth the cost unless you're working with huge files (e.g., video editing).

I would just use integrated graphics at this point. The only reason I have a graphics card is that my current computer is old enough that it won't run my display properly without one. I have had better luck with AMD graphics lately if you need one, though there are others here whose experiences oppose my own. So, YMMV. It's easier to not deal with it if you don't have to.

And the weirder detail things...

A case with a mesh front panel (not sealed). GamersNexus recently did a test comparing one of the loudest cases they've tested (RV07, I think) to a BeQuiet DarkBase 600 silence-focused case. When they changed the RV07 to better fans and adjusted the fan curves to equalize noise performance, the open front case ran noticeably cooler...which means that if you can accept the computer running warmer, you can make it even quieter than the silence-focused case.

I've got a Fractal Design Meshify C right now, and it's quieter than the amplifier noise from my monitors (which is about as loud as my NAS from the next room when it's running at full tilt). The reason is that silence-focused cases don't actually do anything to reduce noise except close the case off...which means you must run fans faster and accept higher temperatures. They do have some padding, but just like the crummy "acoustic foam"; it doesn't do anything but reduce extreme treble...and not very well. There's not enough mass to actually isolate the noise. It's not worth it.

All PWM fans...be ready to throw out the ones that come with your case because they're probably crap. Noctua, BeQuiet, and Thermaltake are within a couple percent of each other in terms of noise normalized performance, as long as they're PWM and you set them to their "silent" fan curve either in your motherboard or software. I'd choose between them based on aesthetics.

Noctua, BeQuiet, Cryorig, etc. higher-end air cooler. You generally don't have to go all out. The cooler is not the limit of thermal performance. Without delidding, in my experience, there's no difference between a Noctua U9S and D15S except the fan speed...and that difference isn't audible in my setup. A U9S also guarantees the cooler won't interfere with RAM or the first PCIe slot.

Water cooling seems like it's not worth it. Among other things, it's more expensive and generally only gives short-term benefits...people think it makes a bigger difference than it does because they don't realize that it takes half an hour or so for the liquid to heat up and actually measure performance, as opposed to a few seconds for an air cooler...which also means the CPU stays warm for longer after you're done hammering it. They also tend to make it harder to get airflow over the VRM unless you have basically perfect case airflow. Depending on the case, it can also make people lazier to the point that the chipset heatsink doens't get airflow either. If you're going to go with an AIO liquid cooler, it seems like the Cryorig ones might be the best option right not just because they have a fan on top of the block to throw some air at the VRM.

Liquid coolers are smaller and generally look better. But, I haven't seen any evidence of a real performance benefit. Plus, if the pump fails, the computer overheats very quickly, potentially without a warning. If the fan in an air cooler fails, the tower will still work with case airflow at least long enough for you to shut the computer down properly. And, obviously, there's no risk of an air cooler leaking. The dual-tower designs from Noctua and BeQuiet are almost good enough to run without a fan, depending on the CPU (though I don't recommend it).

The limiting factor of cooling a modern intel CPU is the thermal material they use between the die and the heat spreader, not the cooler you attach. Over-spending on the cooler only makes sense if you're going to delid the CPU. Delidding does make a big difference, even on the soldered 9th gen processors. It's actually kind of disappointing.

I got bored and delided the i5 in one of my extra toy computers, and it took about 12 degrees C off the CPU temps using the stock cooler, and that was with noctua thermal paste replacing the crappy intel paste (plus removing the adhesive and relying on the socket latch to hold the IHS on), not anything extreme like liquid metal (which requires periodic maintenance).

But, you don't need to delid. A decent air cooler is plenty for a very quiet system without thermal throttling.

I haven't tested the z390 motherboards yet. It slightly concerns me that they included wifi in the chipset. It's cool if you intend to use wifi, but I could see it negatively affecting DPC latency if you don't, at least potentially. If you decide you'll never want a 9th gen CPU, a z370 might be a better choice, though it only saves $10-20 or so.
JSMastering is offline   Reply With Quote