View Single Post
Old 08-05-2009, 05:21 AM   #22
dub3000
Human being with feelings
 
dub3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,831
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG View Post
Seems silly that they should process on demand using up CPU resources rather than just resampling to the project sample rate when imported. Am I missing something here.
because the sample rate is dynamic i.e. you can do smooth ramping of playrate and stuff i think. also saves generating lots of gigantic temporary files.

pro tools pre-processes audio on import and it's slow as hell. i think i prefer reaper's way. same with time stretching - reaper is way better in that regard (non-destructive time stretch yay). you can always manually glue items to lock them to the rate if you want to do it like that.
dub3000 is offline   Reply With Quote