View Single Post
Old 04-02-2018, 04:34 AM   #98
spk77
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,668
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geraintluff View Post
I actually fixed the performance issue I mentioned there (got a 5x boost by refactoring my filters to use pseudo-objects instead of arrays), so I think it's now only 2x slower than ReaEQ, which is what Justin said to expect from JSFX.

I also put in an extra dial (visible if you hit "Freeze") that reduces the number of bands used for correction by merging similar ones - it's not a world of difference, but between those two improvements I think the performance advantages of exporting to ReaEQ are less dramatic. I now use it directly, without ReaEQ.

Gains could still be exposed - there's actually up to 50 bands, so you'd need 50 gains, a band-count, a Q value, and enough information to reconstruct the filter frequencies (you can't export the freqs as 50 individual sliders because I believe there's a 64-slider limit). If your goal is performance, you might not want to just create 30-50 bands in ReaEQ, but perhaps design a different (smaller) set of features to match the curve.
Thanks for your reply!
No performance issues here - it was just an idea
spk77 is offline   Reply With Quote