View Single Post
Old 01-22-2018, 07:39 AM   #530
fundorin
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 554
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Waddington View Post
Wow 37% is a LOT for any app, I can see why people avoid Bluetooth.
Where did you get that number? You mean, the picture? It's the overall RAM load of my PC. Not BT process. Firefox is eating memory for breakfast:


Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Waddington View Post
If you aren't having problems it simply means you are not taxing your system enough to expose it.
Believe me, I do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Waddington View Post
Apparently @CableAddict is stressing his system enough to expose it.
Simple as that.
I highly doubt it. What is most likely is that he still thinks that BT protocol is as slow as it was in times of version 1.1/1.2.

Modern BLE works at the same frequencies as modern wi-fi and, AFAIR, they're very similar in terms of speed/latency.
The latest BT 5.0 has 6,25 MB/s speed. I had no noticable audio latency with BT 4.2 headphones and my phone. Obviously, BT 5.0 is at least two times faster with same same/better latency.
So, if it's good for audio streaming, it would be best for simple midi/osc protocols.
fundorin is offline   Reply With Quote