Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Waddington
Wow 37% is a LOT for any app, I can see why people avoid Bluetooth.
|
Where did you get that number? You mean, the picture? It's the overall RAM load of my PC. Not BT process. Firefox is eating memory for breakfast:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Waddington
If you aren't having problems it simply means you are not taxing your system enough to expose it.
|
Believe me, I do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Waddington
Apparently @CableAddict is stressing his system enough to expose it.
Simple as that.
|
I highly doubt it. What is most likely is that he still thinks that BT protocol is as slow as it was in times of version 1.1/1.2.
Modern BLE works at the same frequencies as modern wi-fi and, AFAIR, they're very similar in terms of speed/latency.
The
latest BT 5.0 has
6,25 MB/s speed. I had no noticable audio latency with BT 4.2 headphones and my phone. Obviously, BT 5.0 is at least two times faster with same same/better latency.
So, if it's good for audio streaming, it would be best for simple midi/osc protocols.